Abstract:Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) patients typically receive either tubeless anesthesia or general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA). Patients receiving propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) are at higher risk of sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs) than patients receiving GETA, primarily due to the need for additional airway maneuvers. The increasing use of non-operating room (OR) anesthesia and the perception of a higher incidence of adverse outcomes in non-OR areas has led to the development of devices to improve safety while maintaining efficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the LMA Gastro™ could be used as a safe alternative to tubeless anesthesia for successfully completing ERCPs. Methods: Eligible subjects were identified within the patient population at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Inclusion criteria consisted of adult patients (≥18 years old) scheduled for elective ERCP with TIVA. This was a prospective observational study in which the following data were collected: number of attempts and time to successful supraglottic airway (SGA) placement, vital signs, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), median end-tidal CO2, practitioner satisfaction, and any complications. Results: A total of 30 patients were included in this study. The overall rate of successful SGA placement within 3 attempts was 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.8-99.9) or 29/30. The rate of successful ERCP with SGA placement within 3 attempts was 93.3% (95% CI, 77.9-99.2) or 28/30. Both the gastroenterologist and anesthesiologist reported satisfaction with the device in 90% of the cases (in 66.7% of the cases both anesthesiologist and gastroenterologist scored the device a 7/7 for satisfaction). Patients maintained an SpO2 of 95%-100% from induction to discharge, with the exception of 1 patient who had an SpO2 of 93%. The median end-tidal CO2 during the procedure for all patients was 35 mm Hg. Observed aspiration did not occur in any patient. Symptoms of hoarseness (13.3%), mouth soreness (6.7%), sore throat (6.6%), and minor bleeding/cuts/redness/change in taste to the tongue (3.3%) were determined through patient questioning before postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the LMA Gastro might be a safe alternative for ERCP procedures. There was a high level of practitioner satisfaction. Only minor complications, such as hoarseness, mouth or throat soreness, or minor trauma to the tongue were experienced by patients. Similar incidences of complications may occur with GETA and tubeless anesthesia. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients; all patients maintained adequate oxygenation and required only minimal blood pressure support.

Safety Of Endoscopic Ultrasonography Latex Balloon Use In Patients With A Latex Allergy

Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events

Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review

Utilizing a balloon sheath and miniprobe for diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound in eosinophilic esophagitis: a case series

Safe Continuation of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists at Endoscopy: A Case Series of 57 Adults Undergoing Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty

Epidemiology and Triggers of Severe Perioperative Anaphylaxis: An 8-Year Single-Center Study

Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Esophageal Injury After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Safety and efficacy of large balloon dilatation under fluoroscopy

S1635 Safety and Feasibility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography Guided Liver Biopsy (EUS-LB) in a Free-Standing Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC)

Safety of the LMA®Gastro™ for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Efficacy, safety, and impact on procedural outcomes of local anesthesia in endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Assessment of risk factors for adverse events in analgosedation for pediatric endoscopy: A 10‐year retrospective analysis

Prospective Assessment of Safety, Tolerance, and Perceptions of Awake Airway and Esophageal Dilation

The Awareness and Experience About Endoscopic Adverse Events Among South Korean Endoscopists

Endoscopic Radial Incision Versus Endoscopic Balloon Dilation As Initial Treatments of Benign Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture.

Controversies in Endobronchial Ultrasound

Endoscopic pancreatic balloon sphincteroplasty for difficult to treat pancreatic stones and strictures: experience in 80 patients

Is it necessary to stop glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists prior to endoscopic procedure? A retrospective study

Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: a large, single center experience

Fluoroscopy-free Minimally Invasive Ureteral Stricture Balloon Dilatation: a Retrospective Safety and Efficacy Cohort Study

The Procedureless Elipse Gastric Balloon Program: Multicenter Experience in 1770 Consecutive Patients