Abstract:El Nino has two different flavors, eastern Pacific (EP) and central Pacific (CP) El Ninos, with different global teleconnections. However, their different impacts on the interannual carbon cycle variability remain unclear. Here we compared the behaviors of interannual atmospheric CO2 variability and analyzed their terrestrial mechanisms during these two types of El Ninos, based on the Mauna Loa (MLO) CO2 growth rate (CGR) and the Dynamic Global Vegetation Model's (DGVM) historical simulations. The composite analysis showed that evolution of the MLO CGR anomaly during EP and CP El Ninos had three clear differences: (1) negative or neutral precursors in the boreal spring during an El Nino developing year (denoted as "yr0"), (2) strong or weak amplitudes, and (3) durations of the peak from December (yr0) to April during an El Nino decaying year (denoted as "yr1") compared to October (yr0) to January (yr1) for a CP El Nino, respectively. The global land-atmosphere carbon flux (F-TA) simulated by multi-models was able to capture the essentials of these characteristics. We further found that the gross primary productivity (GPP) over the tropics and the extratropical Southern Hemisphere (Trop + SH) generally dominated the global F-TA variations during both El Nino types. Regional analysis showed that during EP El Nino events significant anomalous carbon uptake caused by increased precipitation and colder temperatures, corresponding to the negative precursor, occurred between 30 degrees S and 20 degrees N from January (yr0) to June (yr0). The strongest anomalous carbon releases, largely due to the reduced GPP induced by low precipitation and warm temperatures, occurred between the equator and 20 degrees N from February (yr1) to August (yr1). In contrast, during CP El Nino events, clear carbon releases existed between 10 degrees N and 20 degrees S from September (yr0) to September (yr1), resulting from the widespread dry and warm climate conditions. Different spatial patterns of land temperatures and precipitation in different seasons associated with EP and CP El Ninos accounted for the evolutionary characteristics of GPP, terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER), and the resultant F-TA. Understanding these different behaviors of interannual atmospheric CO2 variability, along with their terrestrial mechanisms during EP and CP El Ninos, is important because the CP El Nino occurrence rate might increase under global warming.

The reduced net carbon uptake over Northern Hemisphere land causes the close-to-normal CO 2 growth rate in 2021 La Niña

Unusual characteristics of the carbon cycle during the 2015−2016 El Niño

Unusual Characteristics Of The Carbon Cycle During The 2015-2016 El Nino

Low latency carbon budget analysis reveals a large decline of the land carbon sink in 2023

Impact of the 2015/2016 El Niño on the terrestrial carbon cycle constrained by bottom-up and top-down approaches

The Decline in Tropical Land Carbon Sink Drives High Atmospheric CO2 Growth Rate in 2023

Seasonal compensation implied no weakening of the land carbon sink in the Northern Hemisphere under the 2015/2016 El Niño

Vegetation Greenness and Land Carbon-Flux Anomalies Associated with Climate Variations: a Focus on the Year 2015

Anomalous Net Biome Exchange Over Amazonian Rainforests Induced by the 2015/16 El Niño: Soil Dryness‐Shaped Spatial Pattern but Temperature‐dominated Total Flux

Contrasting Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Responses to the 1997/98 and 2015/16 Extreme El Niño Events

Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions Across the Northern High Latitudes

Contrasting interannual atmospheric CO2 variabilities and their terrestrial mechanisms for two types of El Ninos

Contrasting behaviors of the atmospheric CO 2 interannual variability during two types of El Niños

Increasingly negative tropical water-interannual CO2 growth rate coupling

Recent Warming Has Resulted in Smaller Gains in Net Carbon Uptake in Northern High Latitudes

Large‐Scale Droughts Responsible for Dramatic Reductions of Terrestrial Net Carbon Uptake over North America in 2011 and 2012

Lower Land-Use Emissions Responsible for Increased Net Land Carbon Sink During the Slow Warming Period

Increased high‐latitude photosynthetic carbon gain offset by respiration carbon loss during an anomalous warm winter to spring transition

Increasingly negative tropical water–interannual CO 2 growth rate coupling

Dominant role of the non-forest woody vegetation in the post 2015/16 El Niño tropical carbon recovery.

Abrupt Seasonal Transitions in Land Carbon Uptake in 2015