Potential Unreliability of Uncommon ALK, ROS1, and RET Genomic Breakpoints in Predicting the Efficacy of Targeted Therapy in NSCLC

Weihua Li,Lei Guo,Yutao Liu,Lin Dong,Lin Yang,Li Chen,Kaihua Liu,Yang Shao,Jianming Ying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.156
IF: 20.121
2021-03-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Introduction</h3><p>Variable genomic breakpoints have been identified through the application of target-capture next-generation DNA sequencing (DNA NGS) for <em>ALK/ROS1/RET</em> fusion detection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated whether <em>ALK/ROS1/RET</em> genomic breakpoint location can predict matched targeted therapy efficacy.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>NSCLCs were analyzed by DNA NGS, target-specific next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA NGS), whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>In total, 3787 NSCLC samples were analyzed. DNA NGS detected <em>ALK</em>, <em>ROS1</em> and <em>RET</em> fusions in 241, 59 and 76 cases, respectively. These fusions were divided into canonical (single <em>EML4-ALK</em>, <em>CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4-ROS1</em> and <em>KIF5B/CCDC6-RET</em> fusions), non-canonical (single non-<em>EML4-ALK</em>, non-<em>CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4-ROS1</em> and non-<em>KIF5B/CCDC6-RET</em> fusions) and primary/reciprocal (both primary and reciprocal rearrangements were detected) subtypes based on genomic breakpoint position, and non-canonical and primary/reciprocal subtypes were defined as uncommon fusions. Further RNA sequencing/IHC showed that 6 of 47 (12.8%) uncommon fusions actually were non-productive rearrangements that generated no aberrant transcripts/proteins. Moreover, genomic breakpoints of canonical <em>ALK/RET</em>, but not <em>ROS1</em>, fusions always predicted breakpoints at the transcript level, whereas 85.4% (35/41) of uncommon fusions actually produced canonical fusion transcripts. Patients with uncommon <em>ALK</em> fusion (<em>n</em>=31) who received first-line crizotinib exhibited shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) than patients with canonical <em>ALK</em> fusion (<em>n</em>=53, 8.4 months versus 12.0 months; <em>P</em>=0.004). However, no difference in PFS was observed when only ALK RNA/protein-positive cases were analyzed (<em>P</em>=0.185).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Uncommon <em>ALK/ROS1/RET</em> genomic breakpoint is an unreliable predictor of matched targeted therapy efficacy. Functional validation by RNA or protein assay may add value for accurate detection and interpretation of rare fusions.</p>
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the reliability of rare ALK, ROS1, and RET gene breakpoints in predicting the efficacy of targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Specifically, the researchers systematically characterized ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions, particularly rare variants, through comprehensive molecular analyses (including target-captured next-generation DNA sequencing, specific target next-generation RNA sequencing, whole transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry) to determine whether these rare gene breakpoints can reliably predict the efficacy of targeted therapy. The study found that rare gene breakpoint locations cannot reliably predict the efficacy of targeted therapy, and functional validation (such as RNA or protein detection) is of significant value for the accurate detection and interpretation of rare fusions.