Abstract:Recent clinical trials have reported that in combination with hypomethylating agents, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax can induce responses in over 70% of older previously untreated AML patients who are unfit for conventional chemotherapy. These findings led to the recent United States Food and Drug Administration approval of this regimen for this population, and it is now considered to be the standard care. However, a significant minority of patients do not achieve a remission and are refractory. In addition, the majority of patients who do achieve a remission ultimately relapse. It is therefore critical to identify AML patients who are likely to be resistant to venetoclax-based therapy. To initially address this question, we retrospectively reviewed 75 newly diagnosed AML patients who received venetoclax + azacitidine (VEN+AZA) at our institution and analyzed several baseline clinical features to determine the ability of each to predict disease that was refractory to treatment (defined as a lack of complete remission [CR], CR with incomplete recovery of peripheral blood counts [CRi], partial remission, or morphological leukemia free state [MLFS]). Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed the presence of FAB-M5 to be associated with disease that was refractory to VEN+AZA (Table 1). Given that FAB-M5 represents AML with monocytic differentiation, these findings indicate a strong correlation between myeloid differentiation status and resistance to venetoclax. Using multicolor flow cytometry, we show bone marrow specimens of typical FAB-M5 patients who were refractory to VEN+AZA presented dominant monocytic disease that has an immunophenotype of CD45-bright/SSC-high/CD117-/CD11b+/CD68+ (Figure A). In contrast, bone marrow specimens of typical FAB-M0/M1/M2 patients who achieved CR with VEN+AZA presented as a single dominant disease population that is CD45-med/SSC-low/CD117+/CD11b-/CD68- (Figure B). In a subset of AML patients, we observed the co-existence of both phenotypically primitive and monocytic populations, which we term "MPM" AML (for Mixed Primitive/Monocytic). We observe that after attaining CR with VEN+AZA treatment and subsequent relapse, MPM-AML showed almost complete loss of the primitive subpopulation, and evolved to a dominant monocytic disease (Figure C). These data indicate that VEN+AZA treatment induces strong selection of the monocytic phenotype. Importantly, when we compared the immunophenotype of six pairs of diagnostic/relapse specimens from AML patients treated with conventional intensive induction chemotherapy, we observed selection of a more primitive phenotype, suggesting the drive toward a monocytic phenotype observed at relapse appears to be a unique consequence of VEN+AZA therapy. To our knowledge, selection of a monocytic phenotype at relapse has never been previously observed in AML, suggesting the relapse after VEN+AZA may represent a new clinical entity. Mechanistically, using RNA-seq we show the global transcriptome of monocytic AMLs are distinct from primitive AMLs, suggesting they represent two broad classes of AML with likely differential responses to therapy. Indeed, we demonstrate that AML with a primitive immunophenotype is dependent on BCL-2 activity as a means to drive oxidative phosphorylation, a critical requirement for survival of leukemia stem cells. Conversely, AML with a more differentiated monocytic phenotype is no longer dependent on BCL-2, but rather switches to MCL-1 as a mediator of oxidative phosphorylation. Using colony-forming and xenograft assays, we show the stem and progenitor potential of monocytic AMLs are selectively more sensitive to MCL-1 inhibition comparing to BCL-2 inhibition. Together, our study suggests a significantly higher refractory/relapse risk for monocytic AML patients treated with VEN+AZA (Figure D). Further, for those AML patients who do respond to initial VEN+AZA treatment, the therapy drives a powerful selective process resulting in emergence of more differentiated monocytic disease in some patients. Based on these findings, we propose that AML exists on a developmental spectrum that is inherently fluid, where with appropriate selective pressure the disease can acquire characteristics of a more differentiated state. Further, our data indicate that optimal AML therapy will require strategies designed to target both primitive and myeloid phenotypes. Disclosures Pollyea: Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Diachii Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Savona:TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Patents & Royalties; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Mayo Genetic Risk Models for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Venetoclax + Hypomethylating Agent

Venetoclax and hypomethylating agent combination therapy in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: Genotype signatures for response and survival among 301 consecutive patients

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Differentiation State and Genotype Influence Anti-Apoptotic Protein Expression, Venetoclax Sensitivity, and Survival in AML

Genetic Risk Stratification and Outcomes Among Treatment-Naive Patients With AML Treated With Venetoclax and Azacitidine

Genetic characteristics predict response to venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Predictive Models for Long Term Survival of AML Patients Treated with Venetoclax and Azacitidine or 7+3 Based on Post Treatment Events and Responses: Retrospective Cohort Study

Developmental Plasticity of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Mediates Resistance to Venetoclax-Based Therapy

Influence of Molecular Abnormalities on Treatment Response of Venetoclax Plus Azacytidine and Homoharringtonine Versus Venetoclax Plus Hypomethylating Agent in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Response to Venetoclax in Combination with Low Intensity Therapy (LDAC or HMA) in Untreated Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with IDH, FLT3 and Other Mutations and Correlations with BCL2 Family Expression

Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a propensity score matched multicenter cohort study

A simplified risk model for pretreatment stratification of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine

Data from Monocytic Subclones Confer Resistance to Venetoclax-Based Therapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax compared with intensive induction chemotherapy regimens in molecularly defined secondary AML

Prediction of Clinical Response for Frontline Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Using the Cellworks Omics Biology Model (CBM): Mycare-021-02

Venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Machine Learning of Genomic Factors in 1,961 Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Identifies Patients with Very Good or Very Poor Prognosis Who Do Not Benefit from Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in First Remission

Abstract 3400: Single-cell proteogenomics analysis of AML samples treated with decitabine and venetoclax reveals divergent treatment escape mechanisms

Outcome of adult acute myeloid leukemia patients with extramedullary disease and treatment with venetoclax/hypomethylating agents

Development of a dynamic counterfactual risk stratification strategy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine

Venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in the first‐line treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity and Functional Genomics Platform Identifies Novel Combinations Targeting Intrinsic and Extrinsic Apoptotic Signaling Pathways in Multiple Myeloma