Abstract:Introduction and Objectives Relevant, meaningful, and achievable data points are critical in objectively assessing quality, utility, and outcomes in female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery. A minimum data set female SUI surgery studies was proposed by the first American Urological Association guidelines on the surgical management of female SUI in 1997, but recommendation adherence has been suboptimal. The Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgical Publication Working Group (WG) was created from members of several prominent organizations to formulate a recommended standard of study structure, description, and minimum outcome data set to be utilized in designing and publishing future SUI studies. The goal of this WG was to create a body of evidence better able to assess the outcomes of female SUI surgery. Methods The WG reviewed the minimum data set proposed in the 1997 AUA SUI Guideline document, and other relevant literature. The body of literature was examined in the context of the profound changes in the field over the past 25 years. Through a DELPHI process, a standard study structure and minimum data set were generated. Care was taken to balance the value of several meaningful and relevant data points against the burden of creating an excessively difficult or restrictive standard that would disincentivize widespread adoption and negatively impact manuscript production and acceptance. Results The WG outlined standardization in four major areas: (1) study design, (2) pretreatment demographics and characterization of the study population, (3) intraoperative events, and (4) posttreatment evaluation, and complications. Forty‐two items were evaluated and graded as: STANDARD—must be included; ADDITIONAL—may be included for a specific study and is inclusive of the Standard items; OPTIMAL—may be included for a comprehensive study and is inclusive of the Standard and Additional items; UNNECESSARY/LEGACY—not relevant. Conclusions A reasonable, achievable, and clinically meaningful minimum data set has been constructed. A structured framework will allow future surgical interventions for female SUI to be objectively scrutinized and compared in a clinically significant manner. Ultimately, such a data set, if adopted by the academic community, will enhance the quality of the scientific literature, and ultimately improve short and long‐term outcomes for female patients undergoing surgery to correct SUI.

The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review

Comparative Effectiveness Of Nonsurgical Treatment For Stress Urinary Incontinence In Adult Women: A Systematic Review And Network Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials

Towards a minimum data set for the female stress urinary incontinence surgical literature: a collaborative work

Minimum important difference of the ICIQ-UI SF score after self-management of urinary incontinence

A systematic review of utility-based and disease-specific quality of life measurement instruments for women with urinary incontinence

A systematic review on outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials on surgical interventions for female stress urinary incontinence: a call to develop a core outcome set

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance

Challenges in applying minimal clinically important difference: a critical review

Quality metrics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery

Heart rate variability dynamics in women with urinary incontinence: a systematic review

A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set

Nonbiologic factors that impact management in women with urinary incontinence: review of the literature and findings from a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases workshop

Recommendations of the SUFU/AUGS/ICS Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgical Publication Working Group: A common standard minimum data set for the literature

Effectiveness of Physiotherapy Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review

Estimating the minimally important difference for the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in cancer

Exploring the Challenges of Using Minimal Invasive Surgery to Treat Stress Urinary Incontinence: Insights from a Retrospective Case-Control Study

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Changes Greatly Based on the Different Calculation Methods

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review

How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales

Minimal important differences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials

The minimal important difference in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An analysis of double-blind SSRI trials in adults