Satisfaction in surgically treated patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: an observational study from the canadian spine outcomes and research network
William Chu Kwan,Tamir Ailon,Nicolas Dea,Nathan Evaniew,Raja Rampersaud,W Bradley Jacobs,Jérome Paquet,Jefferson R Wilson,Hamilton Hall,Christopher S Bailey,Michael H Weber,Andrew Nataraj,David W Cadotte,Philippe Phan,Sean D Christie,Charles G Fisher,Supriya Singh,Neil Manson,Kenneth C Thomas,Jay Toor,Alex Soroceanu,Greg McIntosh,Raphaële Charest-Morin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.024
2024-09-26
Abstract:Background context: Healthcare reimbursement is evolving towards a value-based model, entwined and emphasizing patient satisfaction. Factors associated with satisfaction after degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgery have not been previously established. Purpose: Our primary objective was to ascertain satisfaction rates and satisfaction predictors at 3 and 12 months following surgical treatment for DCM. Design: This is a prospective cohort study within Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). Patient sample: Patients in the study were surgically treated for DCM patients who completed 3-month and 12-month follow-ups within CSORN between 2015 and 2021. Outcome measures: Data analyzed included patient demographic, surgical variables, patient-reported outcomes (NDI, NRS-NP, NRS-AP, SF-12-MCS, SF-12-PCS, ED-5Q, PHQ-8), MJOA and self-reported satisfaction on a Likert scale. Methods: Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify significant factors associated with satisfaction, address multicollinearity and ensure predictive accuracy. This process was conducted separately for the 3-month and 12-month follow-ups. Results: Six hundred and sixty-three patients were included, with an average age of 60, and an even distribution across MJOA scores (mild, moderate, severe). At 3-month and 12-month follow-up, satisfaction rates were 86% and 82%, respectively. At 12 months, logistic regression showed the odds of being satisfied varied by +24%, -3%, -10%, -14%, +3%, and +12% for each 1-point change between baseline and 12 months in MJOA, NDI, NRS-NP, NRS-AP, SF-12-MCS, SF-12-PCS. Satisfaction increased 11-fold for each 0.1-point increased in ED-5Q from baseline to 12 months. At baseline, for every 1-point increase in SF-12-MCS, the odds of being satisfied increased by 7%. At 3 months, all PROs (except for NRS-AP change and baseline SF-12-MCS) predicted satisfaction. All logistic regression analyses demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, with the highest 12-month AUC of 0.86 (95%CI = 0.81-0.90). No patient demographic or surgical factors influenced satisfaction. Conclusion: Improvement in Patient Reported Outcomes and MJOA are strongly associated with patient satisfaction after surgery for DCM. The only baseline PRO associated with 12-months satisfaction was SF-12-MCS. No modifiable patient baseline characteristic or surgical variables were associated with satisfaction.