Precise Species Identification by Whole-Genome Sequencing of Enterobacter Bloodstream Infection, China

Wenjing Wu,Li Wei,Yu Feng,Yi Xie,Zhiyong Zong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2701.190154
IF: 16.126
2021-01-01
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Abstract:The clinical importance of <em>Enterobacter</em> spp. remains unclear because phenotype-based <em>Enterobacter</em> species identification is unreliable. We performed a genomic study on 48 cases of <em>Enterobacter</em>-caused bloodstream infection by using in silico DNA–DNA hybridization to identify precise species. Strains belonged to 12 species; <em>Enterobacter xiangfangensis</em> (n = 21) and an unnamed species (taxon 1, n = 8) were dominant. Most (63.5%) <em>Enterobacter</em> strains (n = 349) with genomes in GenBank from human blood are <em>E. xiangfangensis</em>; taxon 1 (19.8%) was next most common. <em>E. xiangfangensis</em> and taxon 1 were associated with increased deaths (20.7% vs. 15.8%), lengthier hospitalizations (median 31 d vs. 19.5 d), and higher resistance to aztreonam, cefepime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin-tazobactam, and tobramycin. Strains belonged to 37 sequence types (STs); ST171 (<em>E. xiangfangensis</em>) was most common (n = 6). Four ST171 strains belonged to a defined clone. Precise species identification has greater implications for epidemiology and infection control than treatment.
immunology,infectious diseases
What problem does this paper attempt to address?