Analytical Analysis of Factors Affecting the Accuracy of a Dual-Heat Flux Core Body Temperature Sensor

Jakub Żmigrodzki,Szymon Cygan,Jan Łusakowski,Patryk Lamprecht

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24061887

IF: 3.9

2024-03-15

Sensors

Abstract:Non-invasive core body temperature (CBT) measurements using temperature and heat-flux have become popular in health, sports, work safety, and general well-being applications. This research aimed to evaluate two commonly used sensor designs: those that combine heat flux and temperature sensors, and those with four temperature sensors. We used analytical methods, particularly uncertainty analysis calculus and Monte Carlo simulations, to analyse measurement accuracy, which depends on the accuracy of the temperature and flux sensors, mechanical construction parameters (such as heat transfer coefficient), ambient air temperature, and CBT values. The results show the relationship between the accuracy of each measurement method variant and various sensor parameters, indicating their suitability for different scenarios. All measurement variants showed unstable behaviour around the point where ambient temperature equals CBT. The ratio of the heat transfer coefficients of the dual-heat flux (DHF) sensor's channels impacts the CBT estimation uncertainty. An analysis of the individual components of uncertainty in CBT estimates reveals that the accuracy of temperature sensors significantly impacts the overall uncertainty of the CBT measurement. We also calculated the theoretical limits of measurement uncertainty, which varied depending on the method variant and could be as low as 0.05 °C.

engineering, electrical & electronic,chemistry, analytical,instruments & instrumentation

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve

This paper aims to analyze the factors that affect the measurement accuracy of dual - heat - flow core body temperature sensors. Specifically, two commonly - used sensor designs are studied: the design that combines heat - flow and temperature sensors, and the design that uses four temperature sensors. Through analytical methods (especially uncertainty analysis calculus and Monte Carlo simulation), how the measurement accuracy is affected by the accuracies of temperature and heat - flow sensors, mechanical structure parameters (such as heat - transfer coefficients), ambient air temperature and core body temperature values is investigated.

### Key points

1. **Research background**:
- Non - invasive core body temperature (CBT) measurement has become increasingly popular in health, sports, work safety and daily - life applications.
- Common applications include protecting health from dangerous working conditions and work intensity, medical diagnosis, evaluating thermal comfort, etc.

2. **Research objectives**:
- Evaluate the measurement accuracies of two commonly - used sensor designs: one is the design that combines heat - flow and temperature sensors, and the other is the design that uses four temperature sensors.
- Use analytical methods (uncertainty analysis calculus and Monte Carlo simulation) to analyze the measurement accuracy.

3. **Main findings**:
- The research results reveal the relationships between the accuracy of each measurement method variant and various sensor parameters.
- All measurement variants exhibit unstable behavior near the point where the ambient temperature is equal to the core body temperature.
- The ratio of heat - transfer coefficients of the dual - heat - flow (DHF) sensor channels has a significant impact on the uncertainty of core body temperature estimation.
- The accuracy of temperature sensors has a significant impact on the overall uncertainty of core body temperature measurement.
- The theoretical measurement uncertainty limits are calculated, and the limit values of different method variants can be as low as 0.05 °C.

### Formula presentation

1. **Core body temperature estimation formula**:
\[
CBT_e=T_{ss}+\frac{q}{h_t}
\]
where:
- \(CBT_e\): estimated core body temperature value
- \(T_{ss}\): skin surface temperature
- \(q\): heat flow through the skin and the sensor
- \(h_t\): heat - transfer coefficient of the skin

2. **Heat - flow formula**:
\[
q = h_s\cdot(T_{ss}-T_{sa})
\]
where:
- \(q\): heat flow through the skin and the sensor
- \(h_s\): heat - transfer coefficient of the sensor's thermal resistance layer
- \(T_{ss}\) and \(T_{sa}\): temperatures at the bottom (skin - sensor) and top (sensor - air) of the sensor

3. **Core body temperature estimation formula for dual - heat - flow sensors**:
\[
CBT_e=T_{ss1}+\frac{q_1\cdot(T_{ss1}-T_{ss2})}{q_2 - q_1}
\]
\[
CBT_e=T_{ss1}+\frac{(T_{ss1}-T_{sa1})\cdot(T_{ss1}-T_{ss2})}{k\cdot(T_{ss2}-T_{sa2})-(T_{ss1}-T_{sa1})}
\]
where:
- \(k\) is the characteristic parameter of the sensor, equal to \(\frac{h_{s2}}{h_{s1}}\)

### Conclusion

This study provides important knowledge for engineers and scientists regarding non - invasive core body temperature measurement methods, especially in terms of improving measurement accuracy. Through analytical methods and Monte Carlo simulation, the study reveals the key factors that affect the measurement accuracy of dual - heat - flow core body temperature sensors, providing a valuable reference for future research and applications.