Abstract:The article argues and demonstrates that classical–neoclassical economics generally does not pretend or claim that its principles apply to domains beyond the economy, specifically wealth, and does not equate the economic and the noneconomic, and the rational and the nonrational. By contrast, the “economic approach to human behavior” or “rational choice theory” precisely does this to legitimize itself by invoking classical–neoclassical economics as supreme authority and its representatives as venerable precursors. The article reveals the economic approach to human behavior as a set of grand theoretical and methodological claims, equivalences, and analogies from the standpoint of conventional economics itself, as well as sociology and other social sciences. It identifies and examines certain indicative instances of such tendencies. The article aims to contribute to understanding better the relations—or rather lack thereof—between conventional economics and contemporary economic and sociological rational choice theory. The economic approach to human behavior is not new, even outside the market sector. The rational choice model provides the most promising basis presently available for a unified approach to the analysis of the social world by scholars from different social sciences. — Gary Becker With respect to those parts of human conduct of which wealth is not even the principal object, to these political economy does not pretend that its conclusions are applicable. — John S. Mill But economy does not treat of all human motives. There are motives nearly always present with us, arising from conscience, compassion, or from some moral or religious source, which economy cannot and does not pretend to treat. These will remain to us as outstanding and disturbing forces; they must be treated, if at all, by other appropriate branches of knowledge. — William Jevons A science, therefore, based on the hypothesis (of universal rationality) would yield a general form of the social phenomenon having little or no contact with reality … — Vilfredo Pareto

Expectations, beliefs, and perceptions in the modern economy: An overview

Learning and Macroeconomics

Rescuing Rational Expectations from Undeserved Ridicule

Expectations Data in Asset Pricing

Learning and Expectations in Dynamic Spatial Economies

Decision making in Economics -- a behavioral approach

Expectation Formation in a Simple New Keynesian DSGE Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Behavioral and Rational Expectations in the Indian Context

Price Dynamics Via Expectations, and the Role of Money Therein

On Macro-Economic Regulation and Expectation Management

Dynamic Decisions Under Subjective Expectations: A Structural Analysis

Expectations, Coordination Failures and Macro Crises

Economic Expectations and an AI Agent

Behavioral Economics: Past, Present and Future

An Empirical Review of Behavioral Decision Making in the Financial Markets

A multi-stage anticipated surprise model with dynamic expectation for economic decision-making

Impact Factors Affecting the Rationality of Managerial Decisions in Business

Understanding Decision-Making in the Adoption of Digital Health Technology: The Role of Behavioral Economics’ Prospect Theory

Diverse Beliefs

Is Expected Utility Theory the Foundation of Decision-Making in Reality?——A Reflection from Prospect Theory

Rational Choice Theory or Pretense? The Claims, Equivalences, and Analogies of the “Economic Approach to Human Behavior”

Expectations, beliefs and the business cycle: tracing back to the deep economic drivers