Abstract:Purpose: This study aims to investigate the differences in binocular corneal parameters and their interrelation with binocular biometric parameters asymmetry in patients with simple myopic anisometropia, thereby elucidating the influence of myopia process on various corneal parameters. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 65 patients with anisometropia in monocular myopia were included. They were divided into low anisometropia group: 3.00D<Δ spherical equivalent (SE)≤−1.00D (Δ represents the difference between the two eyes, i.e., myopic data minus emmetropic data) and high anisometropia group: ΔSE ≤ −3.00D. Corneal and ocular biometric parameters were measured using Pentacam, Corvis ST, and IOL Master 700. Statistical analyses focused on the binocular corneal parameters asymmetry, using the contralateral emmetropia as a control. Results: The mean age of participants was 18.5 ± 1.3 years, with the average SE for myopia and emmetropia being −2.93 ± 1.09D and −0.16 ± 0.41D, respectively. The central corneal thickness (CCT), flat keratometry (Kf), keratometry astigmatism (Ka), total corneal aberration (6 mm) (TOA), surface variance index (ISV), vertical asymmetry index (IVA), stress-strain index (SSI), and first applanation stiffness parameter (SPA1) and ambrosia relational thickness-horizontal (ARTh) showed significant differences between anisometropic fellow eyes ( p < 0.05). There were significant differences in ΔIVA, Δ the difference between the mean refractive power of the inferior and superior corneas (I-S), Δ deviation value of Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display (BAD-D), Δ deformation amplitude ratio max (2 mm) (DAR)and Δ tomographic biomechanical index (TBI) ( p < 0.05) in two groups. Asymmetry of corneal parameters was correlated with asymmetry of ocular biometric parameters. Anisometropia (ΔSE) was positively correlated with ΔIVA (r = 0.255, p = 0.040), ΔBAD-D (r = 0.360, p = 0.006), and ΔSSI (r = 0.276, p = 0.039) and negatively correlated with ΔDAR (r = −0.329, p = 0.013) in multiple regression analysis. Δ mean keratometry (Km), Δ anterior chamber depth (ACD), and Δ biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) were also associated with binocular corneal differences. Conclusion: Compared to contralateral emmetropia, myopic eyes have thinner corneas and smaller corneal astigmatism. Myopic corneas exhibit relatively more regular surface morphology but are more susceptible to deformation and possess marginally inferior biomechanical properties. In addition, there is a certain correlation between anisometropia and corneal parameter asymmetry, which would be instrumental in predicting the development of myopia.

Corneal biomechanical characteristics in myopes and emmetropes measured by Corvis ST: a meta-analysis

Corneal biomechanical properties and potential influencing factors in varying degrees of myopia

Analysis of the correlation between biomechanical properties and corneal densitometry in myopic eyes

Corneal Biomechanical Properties Demonstrate Anisotropy and Correlate with Axial Length in Myopic Eyes

Comparison of Corneal Biomechanics in Post-SMILE, Post-LASEK, and Keratoconic Eyes

Comparative analysis of corneal parameters in simple myopic anisometropia using Scheimpflug technology

Corneal Biomechanics Determination in Healthy Myopic Subjects

A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients

Research of diagnostic value of corneal biomechanical parameters based on Corvis ST in keratoconus

Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects

Association Between Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Myopia in Chinese Subjects

Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics Using Brillouin Microscopy in Chinese Adults With Myopia

Corneal biomechanical metrics of healthy Chinese adults using Corvis ST.

Relationship among Corneal Stiffness, Thickness, and Biomechanical Parameters Measured by Corvis ST, Pentacam and ORA in Keratoconus

Corneal morphometric and biomechanical properties in patients with pathological and uncomplicated high myopia

Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of Mydriasis-Caused Intraocular Pressure Changes on Corneal Biomechanical Metrics

Association Between Ocular Biomechanics Measured with Corvis ST and Glaucoma Severity in Patients with Untreated Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Between Post-LASIK Ectasia and Primary Keratoconus

Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Asymmetric Visual Field Damage in Patients with Untreated Normal Tension Glaucoma

Evaluation of changes in corneal biomechanics after orthokeratology using Corvis ST