Abstract:We write our first Editorial as Lead Editors of The Curriculum Journal against the political backdrop of turbulent scenes in the UK Parliament. On 12 March 2019, Members of Parliament voted (for a second time) to categorically reject the Prime Minister's 'deal' for exiting the European Union. The following day, they voted almost as decisively to reject a 'no deal' exit from the EU. Despite this, at the time of writing it is still quite possible that the UK is spiralling inexorably towards a chaotic (some would say catastrophic) no deal Brexit, with long term effects on the prosperity and wellbeing of its citizens, on its future trading relations with the rest of the world, and ultimately upon its international standing and reputation.The reasons for Brexit are complex and contested, and must be seen in the context of global trends that are leading to similar turbulence in other settings. These include the rise of populist politics and right-wing extremism, fuelled by fake news, conspiracy theories and (allegedly) manipulation of social media for political gain by malign foreign powers. What is certain in this messy situation is that life for many people is becoming increasingly uncertain in layered and entangled contexts of economic instability, environmental challenges and wars over resources. Complexity, austerity and precarity are hallmarks of modern states, creating the conditions where political dissonance and social unrest might thrive. National governments, for all of their efforts to steer their economies and societies, are buffeted by both local and transnational forces that are often beyond their control. Paradoxically, a potential solution to these issues – transnational cooperation through bodies such as the EU – is itself a casualty of these very same forces. Brexit is, of course, a contemporary manifestation of this phenomenon.As modern democracies struggle for legitimacy within, across and beyond national boundaries, education seems to be yet again expected to provide quick and easy solutions; school curricula and higher education programmes of study in particular are construed as spearheading such 'problem-solving' efforts. National curricula as official-to-be-implemented texts have often been conceptualised in utilitarian terms, rendering them sites of acute contestation, as different social actors (academic, political, social, economic, educational-institutional and others) assert and negotiate their power towards diverse agendas of curricular purpose.While we would not wish to claim that education – and especially schooling – is the magic bullet to address these dilemmas and problems, it is nevertheless the case that education is a vital component in efforts to both create better and more cohesive societies, and to address the economic, social and environmental conditions that potentially destabilise modern societies. This has been widely recognised. For example the OECD, in a recent discussion paper (OECD, 2018 OECD (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD. [Google Scholar]), has identified the important role of education in addressing a number of challenges. The first of these is identified as environmental, for example climate change and degradation of natural resources. The second is economic, for instance creating inclusive and sustainable economic models that do not marginalise whole populations. The third challenge is social, for example dealing constructively with issues relating to migration and increasing social diversity. Underpinning all of this is the need for education systems that develop knowledge and understanding of the complex worlds – social and natural – inhabited by diverse populations, and which go beyond a narrow focus on the development of competencies.There is nothing new, of course, in the trend towards centralised regulation of education systems to address wider social and economic imperatives. Governments through the ages have sought to instrumentalise education, although in recent decades this trend has become more systematic worldwide, as policy discourses migrate and are cherry-picked from one setting to be used in other (Rizvi & Lingard, 2010 Rizvi, F., & Lingard, R. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]). For examp-Abstract Truncated-

Pedagogy for Economic Competitiveness and Sustainable Development

Education Reform for Raising Economic Competitiveness

Overall Vision of 21st Century Pedagogy(Ⅱ)

Unsustainable measures? Assessing global competence in PISA 2018

EDUCATION AND TRAINING AS COMPETITIVENESS ENHANCERS: THE PORTUGUESE CASE

Competitiveness, the Knowledge-Based Economy and Higher Education

Understanding Teacher Education in an Era of Globalization

Twenty-First Century Competencies; about Competencies for Industry 5.0 and the Opportunities for Emerging Economies

Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice and the OECD PISA Global Competence Framework

Time for action: Science education for an alternative future

Curriculum is – or should be – at the heart of educational practice

Designing for empowering curriculum implementation

What Kind of Society Does the School Need? Redefining the Democratic Work of Education in Impatient Times

Competences for Sustainable Development Goals: The Challenge in Business Administration Education

Educating Learners for Their Future, Not Our Past

Integrating education for sustainable development in physical education: fostering critical and systemic thinking

[Education in our time: competency or aptitude? The case for medicine. Part I]

Questioning Education: Learning and Society in a Post-Industrial Era

Barriers to Learning for Sustainability: Reflections from a British Science Teacher

Hindrance to sustainable development: Global inequities, non‐progressive education and inadequate science‐policy dialogue

The Continuing Need for Child-Led Approaches Within Inclusive Systems: A Focus on Transition Across 8 European Countries