Losing lemurs: Declining populations and land cover changes over space and time
Pamela R. Narváez‐Torres,Nicola K. Guthrie,Typhenn A. Brichieri‐Colombi,Cressant P. Razafindravelo,Zachary S. Jacobson,Fredo Tera,Daniel V. Rafidimanana,Zé‐Elinah Rahasivelo,Melody A. Petersen,Hasinala Ramangason,Lea Randall,Jana M. McPherson,Cynthia L. Frasier,Axel Moehrenschlager,Sheila M. Holmes,Edward E. Louis,Steig E. Johnson,Edward E. Louis Jr.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23615
2024-03-13
American Journal of Primatology
Abstract:Losing lemurs: declining populations and land cover changes over space and time. Forest loss and degradation due to land cover changes imperil biodiversity worldwide. Subtropical and tropical ecosystems experience high deforestation rates, negatively affecting species like primates. Madagascar's endemic lemurs face exceptionally high risks of population declines and extirpation. We examined how short‐term land cover changes within a fragmented landscape in southeastern Madagascar impacted the density of lemur species. Using line transects, we assessed density changes in nine lemur species across five forest fragments. Diurnal surveys were conducted monthly from 2015 to 2019 on 35 transects (total effort = 1268 km). Additionally, 21 transects were surveyed nocturnally in 2015 and 2016 (total effort = 107.5 km). To quantify forest cover changes, we generated land use/land cover (LULC) maps from Sentinel‐2 imagery using supervised classification for each year. For the LULC maps, we overlayed species‐specific buffers around all transects and calculated the proportion of land cover classes within them. We observed declines in the annual densities of four diurnal and cathemeral lemur species between 2015 and 2019, with species‐specific declines of up to 80% (Varecia variegata). While the density of two nocturnal species decreased, one increased fivefold (Cheirogaleus major) between 2015 and 2016. By 2019, Grassland was the dominant land type (50%), while Paddy Fields had the smallest coverage (1.03%). Mature Agricultural Land increased the most (63.37%), while New Agricultural Land decreased the most (–66.36%). Unexpectedly, we did not find evidence that higher forest cover supported a higher lemur population density within sampled areas, but we found support for the negative impact of degraded land cover types on three lemur species. Our study underscores the urgent need to address land‐use changes and their repercussions for primate populations in tropical ecosystems. The diverse responses of lemur species to modified habitats highlight the complexity of these impacts and emphasize the importance of targeted conservation efforts.
zoology