Comparison of the imaginary part of the atmospheric 1 refractive index structure parameter and aerosol flux based 2 on different measurement methods 3

Xingyu Zhu,Hao Liu,Renming Yuan,Peizhe Wu,Hongsheng Zhang,Jianning Sun,Jiajia Hua

Abstract:: The complexity of aerosol particle properties and the diversity of characterizations make 14 aerosol vertical transport flux measurements and analysis difficult. Although there are different 15 methods, such as aerosol particle number concentration flux and aerosol mass flux based on the eddy 16 covariance principle, and aerosol mass flux measurements based on the light-propagated large-17 aperture scintillation principle, there is a lack of mutual validation among the different methods. In 18 this paper, a comparison of aerosol mass flux measurements based on the eddy covariance principle 19 and aerosol mass flux measurements based on the light-propagated large aperture scintillation 20 principle is carried out. The key idea of aerosol mass flux measurements based on the light-21 propagated large-aperture scintillation principle is the determination of the imaginary part of the 22 atmospheric equivalent refractive index structure parameter (AERISP). In this paper, we will first 23 compare the AERISPs measured by two different methods and then compare the aerosol mass 24 vertical transport fluxes obtained by different methods. The experiments were conducted on the 25 campus of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC). The light propagation 26 experiment was carried out between two tall buildings to obtain the imaginary and real parts of 27 AERISPs for the whole path, which in turn can be used to obtain the aerosol vertical transport flux. 28 An updated visibility meter is installed on the meteorological tower in the middle of the light path, 29 which is utilized to obtain the single-point visibility, which is then converted to the imaginary part 30 of the atmospheric equivalent refractive index (AERI). The imaginary parts of the AERISP were 31 obtained using spectral analysis with visibility data. The results show that the imaginary parts of the 32 AERISPs obtained by different methods are in good agreement. The imaginary part of the AERI 33 measured by the visibility meter and the vertical wind speed obtained by the ultrasonic anemometer 34 were used for covariance calculation to obtain the aerosol vertical transport flux. The trends of 35 aerosol vertical transport fluxes obtained by different methods are consistent, and there are 36 differences in some details, which may be caused by the inhomogeneity of the vertical transport of 37 aerosol fluxes. The experimental results also show that urban green land is a sink area for aerosol 38 particles.

Physics,Environmental Science