Abstract:Appearances and qualities of remote sensing images are affected by different atmospheric conditions, quality of sensors, and radiometric calibrations. This heavily challenges the generalization ability of a deep learning or other machine learning model: the performance of a model pretrained on a source remote sensing data set can significantly decrease when applied to a different target data set. The popular generative adversarial networks (GANs) can realize style or appearance transfer between a source and target data sets, which may boost the performance of a deep learning model through generating new target images similar to source samples. In this study, we comprehensively evaluate the performance of GAN-based image-level transfer methods on convolutional neural network (CNN) based image processing models that are trained on one dataset and tested on another one. Firstly, we designed the framework for the evaluation process. The framework consists of two main parts, the GAN-based image-level domain adaptation, which transfers a target image to a new image with similar probability distribution of source image space, and the CNN-based image processing tasks, which are used to test the effects of GAN-based domain adaptation. Second, the domain adaptation is implemented with two mainstream GAN methods for style transfer, the CycleGAN and the AgGAN. The image processing contains two major tasks, segmentation and object detection. The former and the latter are designed based on the widely applied U-Net and Faster R-CNN, respectively. Finally, three experiments, associated with three datasets, are designed to cover different application cases, a change detection case where temporal data is collected from the same scene, a two-city case where images are collected from different regions and a two-sensor case where images are obtained from aerial and satellite platforms respectively. Results revealed that, the GAN-based image transfer can significantly boost the performance of the segmentation model in the change detection case, however, it did not surpass conventional methods; in the other two cases, the GAN-based methods obtained worse results. In object detection, almost all the methods failed to boost the performance of the Faster R-CNN and the GAN-based methods performed the worst.

AugGAN: Cross Domain Adaptation with GAN-Based Data Augmentation

Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation with Generative Adversarial Networks.

Unpaired Salient Object Translation Via Spatial Attention Prior

Image Cross-Domain Translation Algorithm Based on Self-Similarity and Contrastive Learning

GAN-Based Day-to-Night Image Style Transfer for Nighttime Vehicle Detection

UGC: Unified GAN Compression for Efficient Image-to-Image Translation

Dual Generator Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translation

SingleGAN: Image-to-Image Translation by a Single-Generator Network Using Multiple Generative Adversarial Learning.

Evaluating generative adversarial networks based image-level domain transfer for multi-source remote sensing image segmentation and object detection

Domain Adaptive Object Detection with Generative Adversarial Network

Biphasic Learning of GANs for High-Resolution Image-to-Image Translation

Complementary, Heterogeneous and Adversarial Networks for Image-to-Image Translation

DualGAN: Unsupervised Dual Learning for Image-to-Image Translation

Generate To Adapt: Aligning Domains using Generative Adversarial Networks

Effective Visual Domain Adaptation via Generative Adversarial Distribution Matching

Segmentation Guided Image-to-Image Translation with Adversarial Networks

DA-GAN: Instance-level Image Translation by Deep Attention Generative Adversarial Networks (with Supplementary Materials)

Use of Generative Adversarial Network for Cross-Domain Change Detection

Incremental Learning of Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translations

AT-GAN - Attention Transfer GAN for Image-to-Image Translation.

Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Controllable Image-to-Image Translation