Reply to 'fezolinetant: a novel nonhormonal therapy for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause requiring careful evaluation of the benefit-risk balance'

Megan Z. Roberts,Miranda R. Andrus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2416034
2024-10-16
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Abstract:KEYWORDS: We appreciate the additional considerations and data provided in their letter regarding our article [ Citation 1 , Citation 2 ]. In our approach to identifying and reviewing literature on fezolinetant, we did not evaluate and incorporate articles categorized as editorials or commentaries; therefore, the meta-analysis presented in the correspondence letter by Douxfils and colleagues and additional correspondence on the topic of neoplasm risk of fezolinetant were not included within our article [ Citation 3–5 ]. Endometrial malignancy was evaluated in our review given the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations for clinical evaluation of therapies for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and relevance to practitioners and patients considering the potential for endometrial risk among pharmacotherapy options for VMS [ Citation 6 ].
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?