Abstract:Background: Previous studies reported good outcomes of acetabular cup placement using portable navigation systems during THA. However, we are aware of no prospective studies comparing inexpensive portable navigation systems using augmented reality (AR) technology with accelerometer-based portable navigation systems in THA. Questions/purposes: (1) Is the placement accuracy of the acetabular cup using the AR-based portable navigation system superior to that of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system? (2) Do the frequencies of surgical complications differ between the two groups? Methods: We conducted a prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving patients scheduled for unilateral THA. Between August and December 2021, we treated 148 patients who had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, idiopathic osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or femoral neck fracture and were scheduled to undergo unilateral primary THA. Of these patients, 100% (148) were eligible, 90% (133) were approached for inclusion in the study, and 85% (126) were finally randomized into either the AR group (62 patients) or the accelerometer group (64 patients). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed, and there was no crossover between groups and no dropouts; all patients in both groups were included in the analysis. There were no differences in any key covariates, including age, sex, and BMI, between the two groups. All THAs were performed via the modified Watson-Jones approach with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The primary outcome was the absolute difference between the cup placement angle displayed on the screen of the navigation system and that measured on postoperative radiographs. The secondary outcome was intraoperative or postoperative complications recorded during the study period for the two portable navigation systems. Results: There were no differences between the AR and accelerometer groups in terms of the mean absolute difference in radiographic inclination angle (3° ± 2° versus 3° ± 2° [95% CI -1.2° to 0.3°]; p = 0.22). The mean absolute difference in radiographic anteversion angle displayed on the navigation screen during surgery compared with that measured on postoperative radiographs was smaller in the AR group than that in the accelerometer group (2° ± 2° versus 5° ± 4° [95% CI -4.2° to -2.0°]; p < 0.001). There were few complications in either group. In the AR group, there was one patient each with a surgical site infection, intraoperative fracture, distal deep vein thrombosis, and intraoperative pin loosening; in the accelerometer group, there was one patient each with an intraoperative fracture and intraoperative loosening of pins. Conclusion: Although the AR-based portable navigation system demonstrated slight improvements in radiographic anteversion of cup placement compared with the accelerometer-based portable navigation system in THA, whether those small differences will prove clinically important is unknown. Until or unless future studies demonstrate clinical advantages that patients can perceive that are associated with such small radiographic differences, because of the costs and the unquantified risks associated with novel devices, we recommend against the widespread use of these systems in clinical practice. Level of evidence: Level I, therapeutic study.

Accuracy of robotic arm-assisted versus computed tomography-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach: a retrospective study

Comparison of the accuracy of the cup position and orientation in total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip between the Mako robotic arm-assisted system and computed tomography-based navigation

Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty via a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in the supine position improves the precision of cup placement in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Comparison between accuracy of augmented reality computed tomography-based and portable augmented reality-based navigation systems for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty

Comparison of Implant Placement Accuracy Between Manual, Robot-Assisted, Computer-Navigated, Augmented Reality Navigated, Patient-Specific Instrumentation, and Accelerometer Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty utilizing a fluoroscopy-guided system produced similar cup accuracy and precision relative to a computerized tomography-based robotic platform

The accuracy of acetabular cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty using an image-free navigation system

Accuracy of cup placement and pelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position using a new computed tomography-based navigation system with augmented reality technology

Comparison of accuracy of cup position using portable navigation versus alignment guide in total hip arthroplasty in supine position

CT-based, robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (Mako) through anterior approach provides improved cup placement accuracy but no difference in clinical outcomes when compared to conventional technique

Reduced variability in cup positioning: the direct anterior surgical approach using navigation

Improved accuracy and fewer outliers with a novel CT-free robotic THA system in matched-pair analysis with manual THA

Does Augmented Reality-based Portable Navigation Improve the Accuracy of Cup Placement in THA Compared With Accelerometer-based Portable Navigation? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Intraoperative Technology Use Improves Accuracy of Functional Safe Zone Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing CT-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty

Improved accuracy of a novel fluoroscopy-based robotically assisted THA system compared to manual THA

Precision of Cup Positioning Using a Novel Computed Tomography Based Navigation System in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Periacetabular osteotomy using computed tomography-based navigation: preoperative planning and accuracy evaluation

Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement using CT-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty: Comparison between obese and non-obese patients

Computer‐Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Improves Acetabular Prosthesis Placement Accuracy: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study