Movies and Disability: Positive impact or harm?
C. V. Kraayenoord
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2011.570491
2011-05-17
Abstract:Taylor and Francis CIJD_A_570491. gm 10.1080/1034912X.2011.570491 International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 34-912X (print)/1465-346X (onlin ) Article 2 11 & Francis 58 0 0000Ju e 20 1 hrist vanKr ayeno rd c.vankr ay no rd@uq.edu. u There are mixed opinions about whether the movie The King’s Speech should have got an Oscar for Best Picture at the 2011 Academy Awards. There are also mixed views about whether or not this movie and other movies about people with disabilities provide accurate portrayals of those with disabilities and are a “help” or a “hindrance” to people with disabilities, their families, those who work to assist them, and researchers in the specific field. The King’s Speech portrays the relationship between King George VI (Bertie, as he was known) and Australian speech therapist, Lionel Logue, during the period from 1925 to 1939, as they worked together to address King George’s stutter and fear of speaking in public. The movie has many themes. They include: the socio-economic differences between the pair; the societal and family’s reactions and responses to stuttering—for example, the strong, loving support offered by the King’s wife, Elizabeth, and the ridicule and bullying of the so-called friends of his brother, David; the use of particular approaches to the treatment of stuttering; the relationship between “client” and “therapist” and the boundaries of such a relationship; and the possible causes of stuttering. Exposure of the public to movie depictions of disability, such as this movie, also means that particular views of disability are portrayed. These views, of course, can also be contested. Where stereotyped and patronising views are portrayed, these can be challenged and hopefully addressed. In addition, movies that depict particular theories or models of disability provide an opportunity for comparisons to be made. For example, where a medical model of disability is presented, this can be compared with portrayals that stem from a social justice and equity perspective (see Albrecht, Seelman, & Bury, 2001). The influence of historical, cultural and social contexts on the diagnosis and treatment or management of a disability can also be highlighted. The methods used by Lionel Logue need to be viewed in their historical context. His unique and non-standard approaches should be seen in the context of his work as an actor and elocution teacher (Edgar, 2000). Furthermore, an examination of the literature related to the influence of historical contexts on how people with speech disabilities have been supported, for example, points to the work of Leahy (2005). She has drawn a parallel between the ways in which the Irish of the seventh and eighth centuries provided for people with speech disabilities and the sociological emphasis of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (World Health Organization, 2001) that describes speech difficulties in light of a person’s ability and functioning. She suggests that the principles of human dignity and rights and of
Psychology,Philosophy