COMPARISON OF THE INJURY RISK PREDICTION OF THE THOR-RECLINED DUMMY AND THE THUMS HBM

Pablo Lozano,Alessandro Gravina,Simona Roka,William Marshall,G. Mensa
Abstract:– Autonomous vehicles are expected to allow car occupants to position themselves in more relaxed positions inside the vehicle. These new seating postures constitute a new challenge for crash safety analysis. Therefore, new crash test protocols, adapted to this new paradigm, may be required in the future. In the literature, most of the virtual reclined posture analysis has been performed using Human Body Models (HBMs) which are increasingly used to assess vehicle safety and injury risk, as currently regulated ATDs (Anthropomorphic Test Devices) are neither designed nor validated for reclined seating configurations. Nevertheless, these HBM simulation studies need to be correlated against repeatable physical tests that allow future cars to be rated according to regulation and consumer testing protocols. New options for crash dummies such as the THOR-Reclined kit from CELLBOND; which allows adapting the THOR ATD for these new reclined seating postures, are being developed and may enable the performance of physical tests in reclined occupant positions. However, the question of whether its performance is comparable to that of an HBM remains unanswered. A series of simulations were then conducted comparing the behavior of the THOR-Reclined simulation model and the THUMS v4.1. The ATD and the HBM FE models were compared by means of kinematics, kinetics, restraint system outputs, injury criteria, and injury risk prediction. The result of this comparison will be discussed in this paper. TECHNICAL
Medicine,Engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?