Abrogation of graft ischemia‐reperfusion injury in ischemia‐free liver transplantation

Zhiyong Guo,Jinghong Xu,Shanzhou Huang,Meixian Yin,Qiang Zhao,Weiqiang Ju,Dongping Wang,Ningxin Gao,Changjun Huang,Lu Yang,Maogen Chen,Zhiheng Zhang,Zebin Zhu,Linhe Wang,Caihui Zhu,Yixi Zhang,Yunhua Tang,Haitian Chen,Kunpeng Liu,Yuting Lu,Yi Ma,Anbin Hu,Yinghua Chen,Xiaofeng Zhu,Xiaoshun He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.546
IF: 8.554
2022-04-01
Clinical and Translational Medicine
Abstract:Ischemia free liver transplantation (IFLT) procedure can largely avoid the biological consequences of graft ischemia‐reperfusion injury.IFLT maintains active pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) metabolism and redox homeostasis.IFLT prevents hepatocytes death and the activation of inflammation and immune response.BackgroundIschemia‐reperfusion injury (IRI) is considered an inherent component of organ transplantation that compromises transplant outcomes and organ availability. The ischemia‐free liver transplantation (IFLT) procedure has been developed to avoid interruption of blood supply to liver grafts. It is unknown how IFLT might change the characteristics of graft IRI.MethodsSerum and liver biopsy samples were collected from IFLT and conventional liver transplantation (CLT) recipients. Pathological, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics analyses were performed to identify the characteristic changes in graft IRI in IFLT.ResultsPeak aspartate aminotransferase (539.59 ± 661.76 U/L versus 2622.28 ± 3291.57 U/L) and alanine aminotransferase (297.64 ± 549.50 U/L versus 1184.16 ± 1502.76 U/L) levels within the first 7 days and total bilirubin levels by day 7 (3.27 ± 2.82 mg/dl versus 8.33 ± 8.76 mg/dl) were lower in the IFLT versus CLT group (all p values
oncology,medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?