The correlation between sub‐epidermal moisture assessment and other early indicators of pressure ulcer development: A prospective cohort observational study. Part 2. The correlation between sub‐epidermal moisture assessment, temperature, epidermal hydration and pain

Hannah Jane Elizabeth Wilson,Declan Patton,Aglecia Moda Vitoriano Budri,Fiona Boland,Tom O'Connor,Ciarán Osmond McDonnell,Himanshu Rai,Zena Elizabeth Helen Moore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70058

2024-10-10

International Wound Journal

Abstract:There is growing interest in the roles of temperature, epidermal hydration (EH) and pain in pressure ulcer (PU) development. Investigating correlations between these measures and sub‐epidermal moisture (SEM) will address this knowledge deficit. A prospective observational study enrolled 60 surgical patients from February to November 2021. SEM, temperature, EH and pain were assessed using a SEM scanner, thermography imaging, skin hydration device and numeric pain intensity scale, respectively. Measurements were taken at the sacrum, both heels and a control site, before and after surgery for 3 days. Data were analysed using Pearson or Spearman's correlation. Of the participants, 50% were male with a mean age of 58 years (±13.46). Low positive/negative correlations between SEM and temperature were found at the sacrum. However, after removing outliers, these results were not statistically significant. Other sites and follow‐up days showed negligible correlations. No evidence of a correlation, to low correlations between SEM and EH were observed, but unreliable due to little variation in EH at the heels. Pain showed negligible correlations with SEM. This study did not find consistent evidence of a correlation between SEM, temperature, EH and pain, highlighting the unreliability of temperature and EH for early PU detection. Post‐operative pain may also confound accurate pain assessments.

dermatology,surgery