Abstract:Objective: The aim of this review is to systematize and interpret results produced over one decade of Psychotherapy Process Research (2009-2019) in eight journals. Method: It is a Mixed Studies Review of quantitative as well as qualitative primary studies. The analysis of the results of these studies included a descriptive quantitative part and a qualitative part that followed the logic of Qualitative Meta Analysis, categorizing the main results of both types of studies in a bottom-up procedure that generates specific content categories that are synthesized in further steps of a higher level of abstraction, leading to an "interpretive synthesis" presented in a narrative way. Results: The review shows that psychotherapy process research uses a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods, often creating new procedures. Furthermore, the review indicates that the most commonly assessed macroprocess variables are ongoing change, therapeutic relationship (predominantly therapeutic alliance), and therapeutic intervention; while the most extensively studied microprocess variables are change events, difficult episodes (mainly ruptures), and therapeutic intervention. Macrolevel results reveal that the main contents of ongoing change are the building of new meanings and progressive psychological integration; underscore the association of the therapeutic alliance with ongoing change and outcome; and show the complexity of associating intervention with outcome, because different phases of therapy (and problems) need different assessments. Microlevel results indicate that change events impact on ongoing change and outcome; that for ruptures the key fact is their repair; and that therapist communication has an immediate influence on patient communication. Conclusion: Our knowledge regarding relevant aspects of psychotherapy is very fragmented; robust and replicated results are still scarce. Only a few variables have been found to consistently predict outcome across most therapies. Only in the field of alliance research it has been possible to perform meta-analyses that clearly demonstrate the impact of this factor on final outcomes. Despite these limitations, psychotherapy process research is a powerful tool for uncovering change mechanisms and is at present widely implemented. Our conclusion is that, in order to generate useful future knowledge, change mechanisms need to be linked to ongoing change; this, in turn, requires models of change, hopefully of a transtheoretical nature.

Patient and therapist change process expectations: Independent and dyadic associations with psychotherapy outcomes

Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome?

Inpatient's, therapist's and staff's expectations regarding treatment and their effects on placebo response in the psychiatric ward – results from an add-on oxytocin RCT

An Introduction to Change in Psychotherapy: Moderators, Course of Change, and Change Mechanisms

[Significance of concepts about illness attribution and treatment expectations in the initial treatment phase]

Self-organization in psychotherapy: testing the synergetic model of change processes

Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective

Therapist effects on early change in psychotherapy in a naturalistic setting

Personalized treatment - which interaction ingredients should be focused to capture the unconscious

Group Psychotherapy or Individual Psychotherapy: Patient Characteristics as Predictive Factors

Change motivation and mindfulness in individual psychotherapy: Examining a sample of adult outpatients with depression and/or anxiety

Personality, personality disorders, and the process of change

Lessons from ten years of psychotherapy process research

The impact of outcome expectancy on therapy outcome in adolescents with borderline personality disorder

Patients' perspective on the therapeutic relationship and session quality: the central role of alliance

What makes psychotherapy sessions productive? a new approach to bridging the gap between process research and practice

Test of the phase model of psychotherapy in a training clinic.

Cortisol interdependence during psychotherapy in major depressive disorder

Do patients internalize the positive regard they are offered? A dyadic test of a Rogerian condition

Therapist verification of patient self-concepts as a responsive precondition for early alliance development and subsequent introject change

Outcome prediction in psychological therapy with continuous time dynamic modeling of affective states and emotion regulation.