Fine-resolution landscape-scale biomass mapping using a spatiotemporal patchwork of LiDAR coverages

Lucas K. Johnson,Michael J. Mahoney,Eddie Bevilacqua,Stephen V. Stehman,Grant M. Domke,Colin M. Beier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.103059
IF: 7.5
2022-11-02
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Abstract:Estimating forest aboveground biomass (AGB) at large scales and fine spatial resolutions has become increasingly important for greenhouse gas accounting, monitoring, and verification efforts to mitigate climate change. Airborne LiDAR is highly valuable for modeling attributes of forest structure including AGB, yet most LiDAR collections take place at local or regional scales covering irregular, non-contiguous footprints, resulting in a patchwork of different landscape segments at various points in time. Here, as part of a statewide forest carbon assessment for New York State (USA), we addressed common obstacles in leveraging a LiDAR patchwork for AGB mapping at landscape scales, including selection of training data, the investigation of regional or coverage specific patterns in prediction error, and map agreement with field inventory across multiple scales. Three machine learning algorithms and an ensemble model were trained with Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) field measurements, airborne LiDAR, and topographic, climatic, and cadastral geodata. Using a novel set of plot selection criteria and growth adjustments to temporally align LiDAR coverages with FIA measurements, 801 FIA plots were selected with co-located point clouds drawn from a patchwork of 17 leaf-off LiDAR coverages (2014–2019). Our ensemble model was used to produce 30 m AGB prediction surfaces within a predictor-defined area of applicability (98% of LiDAR coverage) and within four vegetated landcover classes. The resulting AGB maps were compared with FIA plot-level and areal estimates at multiple scales of aggregation. Our model was overall accurate (% root mean squared error 22%–45%; mean absolute error 11.6–29.4 Mg ha -1 ; mean error 2.4–6.3 Mg ha -1 ), explained 73%–80% of field-observed variation, and yielded estimates that were largely consistent with FIA's design-based estimates (89% of estimates within FIA's 95% confidence interval). We share practical solutions to challenges faced in using spatiotemporal patchworks of LiDAR to meet growing needs for AGB prediction and mapping in support of broad-scale applications in forest carbon accounting and ecosystem stewardship.
remote sensing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?