Abstract:Abstract Cell signal networks are orchestrated directly or indirectly by various peptide-mediated protein–protein interactions, which are normally weak and transient and thus ideal for biological regulation and medicinal intervention. Here, we develop a general-purpose method for modeling and predicting the binding affinities of protein–peptide interactions (PpIs) at the structural level. The method is a hybrid strategy that employs an unsupervised approach to derive a layered PpI atom–residue interaction (ulPpI[a-r]) potential between different protein atom types and peptide residue types from thousands of solved PpI complex structures and then statistically correlates the potential descriptors with experimental affinities (KD values) over hundreds of known PpI samples in a supervised manner to create an integrated unsupervised–supervised PpI affinity (usPpIA) predictor. Although both the ulPpI[a-r] potential and usPpIA predictor can be used to calculate PpI affinities from their complex structures, the latter seems to perform much better than the former, suggesting that the unsupervised potential can be improved substantially with a further correction by supervised statistical learning. We examine the robustness and fault-tolerance of usPpIA predictor when applied to treat the coarse-grained PpI complex structures modeled computationally by sophisticated peptide docking and dynamics simulation. It is revealed that, despite developed solely based on solved structures, the integrated unsupervised–supervised method is also applicable for locally docked structures to reach a quantitative prediction but can only give a qualitative prediction on globally docked structures. The dynamics refinement seems not to change (or improve) the predictive results essentially, although it is computationally expensive and time-consuming relative to peptide docking. We also perform extrapolation of usPpIA predictor to the indirect affinity quantities of HLA-A*0201 binding epitope peptides and NHERF PDZ binding scaffold peptides, consequently resulting in a good and moderate correlation of the predicted KD with experimental IC50 and BLU on the two peptide sets, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients Rp = 0.635 and 0.406, respectively.

Q-BioLiP: A Comprehensive Resource for Quaternary Structure-based Protein–ligand Interactions

mPPI: a database extension to visv-ilize structural interactome in a one-to-many manner

PLIP: fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler

A High-Quality Data Set of Protein-Ligand Binding Interactions Via Comparative Complex Structure Modeling

PLIP 2021: expanding the scope of the protein–ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA

Development of QSAR-Improved Statistical Potential for the Structure-Based Analysis of ProteinPeptide Binding Affinities

Exploring the Binding Mechanism Between Human Profilin (PFN1) and Polyproline-10 Through Binding Mode Screening

Ligand-protein database: linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data.

Biomacromolecular Quantitative Structure–activity Relationship (bioqsar): a Proof-of-concept Study on the Modeling, Prediction and Interpretation of Protein–protein Binding Affinity

G4LDB 3.0: a database for discovering and studying G-quadruplex and i-motif ligands

G4LDB 2.2: a database for discovering and studying G-quadruplex and i-Motif ligands

Kdbi: Kinetic Data Of Bio-Molecular Interactions Database

Protein-Protein Interactions: Interface Analysis, Binding Free Energy Calculation and Interaction Design

A comprehensive review of protein-centric predictors for biomolecular interactions: from proteins to nucleic acids and beyond

WeiBI (Web-Based Platform): Enriching Integrated Interaction Network with Increased Coverage and Functional Proteins from Genome-Wide Experimental OMICS Data

PDBBind Optimization to Create a High-Quality Protein-Ligand Binding Dataset for Binding Affinity Prediction

Integrated unsupervised–supervised modeling and prediction of protein–peptide affinities at structural level

Protein-protein interface analysis and hot spots identification for chemical ligand design.

DeepRLI: A Multi-objective Framework for Universal Protein--Ligand Interaction Prediction

PDB-wide Collection of Binding Data: Current Status of the PDBbind Database

BioDolphin as a comprehensive database of lipid–protein binding interactions