Snack foods and lead ingestion risks for school aged children: A comparative evaluation of potentially toxic metals and children’s exposure response of blood lead, copper and zinc levels

Yu Gao,Xiaoping Li,Jie Dong,Yuhan Cao,Tao Li,Howard W Mielke,Howard W. Mielke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127547
IF: 8.8
2020-12-01
Chemosphere
Abstract:<h2 class="section-title u-h3 u-margin-l-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Abstact</h2><p>Snack foods are common and highly advertised to children and serve their natural predispositions for sweet and salty tastes. However, the risk issues of low-cost snacks eaten by 0–6 aged children are lack of more concern. To better understand the issue of low-cost snacks this study considered potentially toxic metals (PTMs) impact on children's health risk, measured PTMs in a collection of 570 collected low-cost snacks contributed by 1342 voluntary participants children aged 0–6 years involved in Xi'an city are conducted. Nine priority PTMs and amounts ranked as Mn &gt; Zn &gt; Cu &gt; Cr &gt; Sb &gt; Pb &gt; Ni &gt; Cd &gt; Co. The Estimated Weekly Intake of PTMs in snacks for children accounted for a proportion of the Provisional Tolerance Weekly Intake. Children's daily snack ingestion of Cr, Cd and Pb were especially concerning. It was noted that all PTMs in flour products contribute to the total Target Hazard Quotient (THQ&gt;1) were observed having a non-carcinogenic risk compared to the single metals Cr, Co and Cd with carcinogenic risk. The correlations between Cu, Pb, Zn in low-cost snacks and children's bloods reflected PTMs especially for Pb that transfers into children's bodies mostly through low-cost foodstuffs ingestion. Also, the elevated blood lead levels (BLLs) depended on readily available, low-quality snacks accessible for children. Therefore, multi-initiatives aimed at improving the quality, increasing awareness, and a PTM monitoring program for low-cost snack food market to young children should be undertaken.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?