Abstract:Abstract Investigations of CRISPR gene knockout editing profiles have contributed to enhanced precision of editing outcomes. However, for homology-directed repair (HDR) in particular, the editing dynamics and patterns in clinically relevant cells, such as human iPSCs and primary T cells, are poorly understood. Here, we explore the editing dynamics and DNA repair profiles after the delivery of Cas9-guide RNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP) with or without the adeno-associated virus serotype 6 (AAV6) as HDR donors in four cell types. We show that editing profiles have distinct differences among cell lines. We also reveal the kinetics of HDR mediated by the AAV6 donor template. Quantification of T50 (time to reach half of the maximum editing frequency) indicates that short indels (especially +A/T) occur faster than longer (>2 bp) deletions, while the kinetics of HDR falls between NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining) and MMEJ (microhomology-mediated end-joining). As such, AAV6-mediated HDR effectively outcompetes the longer MMEJ-mediated deletions but not NHEJ-mediated indels. Notably, a combination of small molecular compounds M3814 and Trichostatin A (TSA), which potently inhibits predominant NHEJ repairs, leads to a 3-fold increase in HDR efficiency.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the insufficient understanding of the kinetics and patterns of homology - directed repair (HDR) editing in clinically relevant cells, such as human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and primary T cells. Specifically, the paper explores the editing kinetics and DNA repair patterns in four cell types using Cas9 - guided RNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes with or without adeno - associated virus serotype 6 (AAV6) as an HDR donor. The study aims to reveal the differences in editing patterns between different cell lines and the kinetic characteristics of AAV6 - mediated HDR templates. In addition, the paper also quantifies the time required to reach half of the maximum editing frequency (\(T_{50}\)), to evaluate that short insertions - deletions (especially +A/T) occur more rapidly than long deletions (>2 bp), while the kinetics of HDR is between non - homologous end - joining (NHEJ) and microhomology - mediated end - joining (MMEJ). The study found that AAV6 - mediated HDR effectively competes with long MMEJ - mediated deletions, but does not outperform NHEJ - mediated small insertions - deletions. Notably, by combining the small - molecule compound M3814 and trifluoromethylaniline (TSA), the major NHEJ repair can be significantly inhibited, thereby increasing the HDR efficiency by three times. These findings are of great significance for improving the efficiency of gene - editing technology in clinical applications.

Dynamics and competition of CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoproteins and AAV donor-mediated NHEJ, MMEJ and HDR editing