Abstract:About one third of patients with non-small cell lung cancer presents with stage III NSCLC at diagnosis 1 . The standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC is concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) followed by adjuvant durvalumab 2 . Adjuvant durvalumab led to a 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates of 42.9% and 33.1% respectively 3 .For patients with resectable stage III NSCLC the standard of care is represented by surgery and (neo) adjuvant or perioperative immune checkpoint blockers (ICB), leading to a 2 years OS rate up to 80% and 2 years PFS rate up to 65% [4][5][6][7] . For patients with stage III NSCLC harboring actionable driver alterations (AGA) radical treatment should be coupled with (neo)adjuvant target treatments, if available 8,9 . Despite the great survival improvements achieved in the recent years, most of the patients who are diagnosed with stage III NSCLC still face disease recurrence (PD). Moreover, many open questions and unmet clinical need are present in this setting 10,11 .The manuscripts included in the present Research Topic try to address open questions and present new evidence about the treatment options for patients with stage III NSCLC.Yu and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1351359 ) performed a meta-analysis based on three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating perioperative ICB for stage II-III NSCLC.Their findings showed that perioperative ICB combined with CT led to better OS, PFS and ORR compared to CT only. At the same time no statistically significant differences in terms of grade≥3 adverse events were noted. This meta-analysis confirmed that the use of ICB in the peri-operative setting is the new gold-standard. Qiao et al ( https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1198768 ) investigated the effectiveness and safety of Shenqi Fuzheng (SFI) injection combined with platinumbased chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC. SFI is an extraction of Codonopsis pilosula and Astragalus membranaceus, which reduces oxidative stress. Their findings are based on 44RCT involving 3475 patients. They showed that SFI significantly reduced CT adverse events (bone marrow depression; nausea; vomiting and diarrhea). This meta-analysis investigates the often neglected research topic of reducing side effects. This is paramount in stage III NSCLC since toxicity represents a main issue in radical treatments in this setting. Shendou Li and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1306311 ) addressed the question whether ICB retreatment might be effective for patients with NSCLC. This retrospective study included 165 patients who were pretreated with ICB: 38.2% received ICB retreatment with atezolizumab while 12.7% and 49.1% received docetaxel and docetaxel+ramucirumab respectively. Patients treated with atezolizumab achieved a significantly better mOS compared to the other two groups (17.7 vs. 7.7 months for docetaxel [p=0.008] and vs 8.9 months for docetaxel+ramucirumab [p=0.047]). These results are particularly interesting since patients with stage III NSCLC receive adjuvant ICB as standard of care but there are no robust data about a ICB retreatment at PD. In the retrospective study presented by Borghetti et al. (N=85), safety and effectiveness of adjuvant durvalumab in a real life scenario were investigated (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1208204 ). Two-year OS was 69.4% in the durvalumab group and 47.9% in the non-durvalumab group (p = 0.015). Two-year PFS was 54.4% in the durvalumab group and 24.2% in the non-durvalumab group (p = 0.007). Of note, 79% had a PDL-1 positive NSCLC and in the remaining 21% PDL-1 status was unknown. A retrospective multicenter analysis (N=1874) described the pattern of treatments in the Asian population (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1117348 ). This study enrolled consecutive patients, from 57 centers, diagnosed with de novo locally advanced stage III NSCLC. CCRT was the most common treatment choice (34%) followed by curative surgery (23%), systemic treatments (21%) and sCRT (11%). The possible different approaches used in this wide cohort to treat stage III highlight that multidisciplinary discussion is paramount in this setting. Finally two studies presented in this research topic investigated new tools for personalizing the treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC. Yang and colleagues (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1158104 ) presented the data about 124 patients with stage III-N2 disease treated with surgery, adjuvant CT and post-operative RT (PORT). They showed that the presence of estrogen receptor was a significant negative prognostic factor, in terms of OS and PFS. These findings bring to light a possible new prognostic factor, possibly helping in

Editorial: Innovative strategies and new insights for the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Expert Consensus on Treatment for Stage III Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer

New options and open issues in the management of unresectable stage III and in early-stage NSCLC: A report from an expert panel of Italian medical and radiation oncologists - INTERACTION group

Revamping Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatments in Stages II and III: Preparing Healthcare for Cutting-Edge Immuno-Oncology Regimens

The role of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy in stage III NSCLC

An Open, Observational Clinical Study of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Induction Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chemotherapy for Patients with Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Experience.

Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy and Sequential Surgical Resection in Initial Unresectable Stage IIIB NSCLC.

An Updated Review of Management of Resectable Stage III NSCLC in the Era of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

Real-World Analysis of Survival and Treatment Efficacy in Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Open issues in the therapeutic management of unresectable stage III NSCLC in the immunotherapy era

Stage III NSCLC treatment options: too many choices

Neoadjuvant Immuno-Chemotherapy: A New Perspective for Stage III NSCLC?

The Multidisciplinary Approach in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer over Ten Years: From Radiation Therapy Optimisation to Innovative Systemic Treatments

Treatment of Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy: Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy strategies for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Current evidence among special populations and future perspectives

Optimization of treatment options for EGFR-mutant, stage III, unresectable NSCLC: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Novel approaches of chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage IIIA and stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

Treatment of newly developed metastases after definitive chemoradiotherapy +/- ICI for unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Treatment Patterns for Patients With Unresected Stage III NSCLC: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

A review of perioperative treatment strategies with immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in resectable and stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer