Abstract:This research explores the failure of competitively tendered projects in the UK construction industry to procure the most suited contractor(s) to conduct the works. Such work may have equal relevance for other developed nations globally. This research seeks to teach clients and their representatives that “lowest price” does not mean “best value”, by presenting a case study of a successfully negotiated tender undertaken by a small-to-medium enterprise (SME) contractor; SME studies are relatively scant in academic literature. By applying the “lessons learnt” principle, this study seeks to improve future practice through the development of a novel alternative procurement option (i.e., negotiation). A mixed philosophical stance combining interpretivism and pragmatism was used—interpretivism to critically review literature in order to form the basis of inductive research to discuss negotiation as a viable procurement route, and pragmatism to analyse perceptions of tendering and procurement. The methods used follow a three-stage waterfall process including: (1) literature review and pilot study; (2) quantitative analysis of case study data; and (3) qualitative data collection via a focus group. Our research underscores the need to advise clients and their representatives of the importance of understanding the scope of works allowed within a tender submission before discounting it based solely on price. In addition, we highlight the failings of competitive tendering, which results in increased costs and project duration once the works commence on site. These findings provide new contemporary insight into procurement and tendering in the construction industry, with emphasis on SME contractors, existing relationships, and open-book negotiation. This research illustrates the adverse effects of early cost estimates produced without first securing a true understanding of project buildability and programming. Our work concludes with a novel insight into an alternative procurement option that involves early SME contractor involvement in an open-book environment, without the need for a third-party cost control.

Risk and Price in the Bidding Process of Contractors

Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Risk Preference on Construction Bid Markups

Understanding risky bidding: a prospect‐contingent perspective

Contractor’s bid pricing strategy: a model with correlation among competitors’ prices

Using Bargaining Game Theory For Risk Allocation Of Public-Private Partnership Projects: Insights From Different Alternating Offer Sequences Of Participants

A Case Study of a Negotiated Tender within a Small-to-Medium Construction Contractor: Modelling Project Cost Variance

Construction Engineering Bidding Risk Analysis

A survey of the bidding practices of Canadian civil engineering construction contractors

Unit-price-based model for evaluating competitive bids

RISK MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE MEASURES FOR BIDDING AND TENDERING IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Risk Assessment Model of Tendering for Chinese Building Projects

Price-formation Mechanism and Cost Control in Construction Project Bidding

Investigation of Bid Price Competition Measured through Prebid Project Estimates, Actual Bid Prices, and Number of Bidders

License Bidding – Sunk Costs that Matter

Modeling the Decision-Making Process Concerning Participation in Construction Bidding

Limited Liability and High Bids in English Auctions

Research on Game Model of Engineering Project Bidding Quotation under the Mode of Tender Control Price

Application of Game Theory against Nature in Supporting Bid Pricing in Construction

Review of Unbalanced Bidding Models in Construction

Addressing Pricing: Value Bidding for Engineers and Consultants

Integration between different construction bidding models to improve profitability and reduce prices