Induction of Nitric Oxide and Its Role in Facial Nerve Regeneration According to the Method of Facial Nerve Injury

Yeon Ju Oh,Dong Keon Yon,Yong Sung Choi,Jinseok Lee,Joon Hyung Yeo,Sung Soo Kim,Jae Min Lee,Seung Geun Yeo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13060741

IF: 7.675

2024-06-20

Antioxidants

Abstract:Nitric oxide (NO) is an important molecule in cell communication that also plays an important role in many biological processes. Given the dual role of NO in nerve degeneration and regeneration after facial nerve injury, we sought to delve deeper into its role through a systematic literature review. A comprehensive review of the literature employing SCOPUS, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases was conducted to evaluate the induction and role of NO in neurodegeneration and regeneration after facial nerve injury. From the 20 papers ultimately reviewed, the central findings were that neuronal nitric oxide synthase(nNOS), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and induced nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) increased or decreased depending on the method of facial nerve damage, damaged area, harvested area, and animal age, and were correlated with degeneration and regeneration of the facial nerve. Research conducted on rats and mice demonstrated that NO, nNOS, eNOS, and iNOS play significant roles in nerve regeneration and degeneration. However, the relationship between nerve damage and NO could not be defined by a simple causal relationship. Instead, the involvement of NOS depends on the type of nerve cell, source of NO, timing, and location of expression, age of the target animal, and proximity of the damage location to the brainstem. Consequently, nNOS, eNOS, and iNOS expression levels and functions may vary significantly.

biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, medicinal,food science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore the role of nitric oxide (NO) in the regeneration process after facial nerve injury and its induction mechanism. Specifically, through a systematic literature review, the author analyzed the production of NO under different facial nerve injury methods and its role in neurodegeneration and regeneration. The study mainly focused on the changes of three nitric oxide synthases (NOS) - neuronal NOS (nNOS), endothelial NOS (eNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS). These changes are related to factors such as injury methods, injury areas, sampling areas and animal ages, and are closely related to the degeneration and regeneration of the facial nerve.

The study found that the expression levels and functions of nNOS, eNOS and iNOS may be significantly different due to factors such as nerve cell types, NO sources, the time and location of expression, the age of the target animals, and the distance between the injury location and the brainstem. This indicates that the response of NO after facial nerve injury is not a simple cause - and - effect relationship, but a complex process affected by multiple factors.

Overall, this paper aims to deeply understand the specific role of NO in the regeneration process after facial nerve injury and provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of related diseases in the future.