Optimizing Use of High-Sensitivity Troponin for Risk-Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Sayhaan R. Goraya,Connor O'Hare,Kelsey A. Grace,William J. Schaeffer,S. Nabeel Hyder,Geoffrey D. Barnes,Colin F. Greineder
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786820
2024-05-25
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Abstract:Background High-sensitivity troponin T (HS-TnT) may improve risk-stratification in hemodynamically stable acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but an optimal strategy for combining this biomarker with clinical risk-stratification tools has not been determined. Study Hypothesis We hypothesized that different HS-TnT cutoff values may be optimal for identifying (1) low-risk patients who may be eligible for outpatient management and (2) patients at increased risk of clinical deterioration who might benefit from advanced PE therapies. Methods Retrospective analysis of hemodynamically stable patients in the University of Michigan acute ED-PE registry with available HS-TnT values. Primary and secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and need for intensive care unit-level care. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine optimal HS-TnT cutoffs in the entire cohort, and for those at higher risk based on the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) or imaging findings. Results The optimal HS-TnT cutoff in the full cohort, 12 pg/mL, was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 3.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48–10.50) and remained a significant predictor after adjusting for the simplified PESI (sPESI) score and serum creatinine (adjusted OR: 3.05, 95% CI: 1.11–8.38). A HS-TnT cutoff of 87 pg/mL was associated with 30-day mortality (OR: 5.01, 95% CI: 2.08–12.06) in patients with sPESI ≥1 or right ventricular dysfunction. Conclusion In this retrospective, single-center study of acute PE patients, we identified distinct optimal HS-TnT values for different clinical uses—a lower cutoff, which identified low-risk patients even in the absence of other risk-stratification methods, and a higher cutoff, which was strongly associated with adverse outcomes in patients at increased risk. C.F.G. had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis, including and especially any adverse effects. S.N.H., S.G., C.O., K.A.G., W.J.S., S.N.H., G.D.B., and C.F.G. contributed substantially to the study design, data analysis and interpretation, and/or the writing of the manuscript. * Current affiliation: Department of Emergency Medicine, Trinity Health Ann Arbor Hospital, Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States. ** Current affiliation: Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States. Received: 30 January 2024 Accepted: 11 April 2024 Article published online: 24 May 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
peripheral vascular disease,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?