Addressing the challenge of building teacher expertise in vocational education and training
Berwyn Clayton,Roger Harris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2019.1612635
2019-01-02
International Journal of Training Research
Abstract:In this issue of the journal, five of the six articles are by Australian authors and their publication coincides with the release of <i>Strengthening skills –</i> the report of the expert review of Australia's vocational education and training system undertaken by the Honourable Steven Joyce from New Zealand.The 192 submissions to the review make for very interesting reading as they clearly demonstrate the diversity of stakeholders with an interest or involvement in VET in Australia. Given the opportunity to comment on what is working well in the sector and what is not, employer bodies, industry and professional associations, industrial and educational unions, state and territory governments, training providers and individuals present a multiplicity of views on the key challenges faced and the changes needed for the VET system to meet the complex demands of skilling the Australian workforce for the future.The Terms of Reference for the expert review set out eight areas for examination including, amongst others: funding, policy and regulatory settings, skills shortages, the impact of technology, qualification structures, the effectiveness and accessibility of information on VET and the identification of case studies of best practice. Specific mentions of the quality of training and the skills of the VET teaching workforce were not designated areas for consideration. Despite this, the ongoing concerns about teacher quality percolated to the surface and the report notes 'around a quarter of submissions to the Review identified the quality of trainers as an issue for the sector' (Commonwealth of Australia, Prime Minister and Cabinet, <span><a href="#">2019</a><span> Commonwealth of Australia, Prime Minister and Cabinet. (<span>2019</span>, <span>April</span>). <span><i>Strengthening skills</i></span>. Expert review of Australia's vocational education and training system. Retrieved from <a href="https://www.pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/domestic-policy/vet-review/strengthening-skills-expert-review-australias-vocational-education-and-training-system">https://www.pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/domestic-policy/vet-review/strengthening-skills-expert-review-australias-vocational-education-and-training-system</a><span> <span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2019&author=Commonwealth+of+Australia%2C+Prime+Minister+and+Cabinet&title=Strengthening+skills">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>, p. 49). A large percentage of the expressed concerns appear to be directed at the mandated qualification for VET practitioners, namely, the Certificate IV in Training and Assessment, and its inability to provide the pedagogical skills needed to meet the needs of diverse learners. Assessment was highlighted as a critical issue as was the currency of teachers' industry experience.The Review suggests the following as strategies for addressing the teacher quality issue: 'strong regulatory requirements around the registration and quality assurance of all RTOs''targeted measures to encourage and highlight best practice for VET trainers''recognising and rewarding teacher quality through teaching awards''providing access to quality professional development' (p. 50).Those with a cynical bent working in the Australian VET system might be saying that we supposedly have the first and last of these solutions already in place. They might also say the other two suggestions would provide encouragement for those teaching in the sector to enhance their practice. However, what continues to be missing is a greater investment in building the pedagogical expertise of the VET teaching workforce and the acknowledgement of just how complex the nature of the work it is expected to undertake. Until these are addressed, teacher quality will continue to be of concern.The theme of VET teacher quality is the focus of a number of the papers in this issue. The first, by <i>Mark Tyler</i> and <i>Darryl Dymock</i>, discusses research into the industry and pedagogical currency of 26 VET practitioners in one Australian VET institution. Through interviews, the researchers gathered data on the teachers' perceptions of their continuing professional development and the processes and practices they used to maintain and develop their pedagogical expertise and industry currency. The results of the study affirm the need for consistent, grounded and nuanced approaches to the development of both teaching skills and industry know-how and a commitment to their continued maintenance.In a similar vein, the paper by <i>Ugochukwu Chinonso Okolie, Elisha Nwonu Elom</i>, <i>Catherine Uchechukwu and Paul Agu Igwe</i> reports on a study that examined the key areas of skill development required by technical college teachers in Nigeria in order to improve the quality of students' experiences and outcomes. Using both a questionnaire with 87 teachers and two focus groups with 14<p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>