Abstract:Abstract Background/Aims Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is a multisystem, large and medium artery vasculitis, which results in significant comorbidity, even mortality. Prompt diagnosis is a pivotal first step in its effective management. To that effect, we set up a fast track service in Eastbourne District General Hospital (EDGH) for a one-stop-shop assessment of GCA referrals with Ultrasound Doppler. Fifteen months from service commencement, we embarked on assessing patient satisfaction of our service users. This exercise could provide vital insight into the effectiveness of our new service, and thus drive improvement. Furthermore, it is well established that patient satisfaction is associated with improved outcomes in patient care, be it due to improved compliance, engagement with the service, or overall better understanding of the underlying condition. Aims 1. To assess overall level of patient satisfaction of our new fast track GCA service against a number of internally set criteria; 2. To improve the effectiveness of the service based on feedback from the actual service users; 3. To improve the level of satisfaction of patients coming through the GCA service. Methods We set up a dedicated GCA clinic aiming to see patients within five days of referral. In order to assess overall patient satisfaction of the service, we formulated a questionnaire-based survey that was posted to 99 service users. We assessed five areas overall: appointment allocation process; staff attitude; information supplied; advice line effectiveness; overall satisfaction. Data were collected and analysed on Microsoft Excell. No patient identifiable details were collected. Results Out of the 99 feedback forms that were sent out, 51 were returned completed within the survey period. The appointment allocation process was assessed as “excellent” by 95% of responders, and “satisfactory” by 5%. Staff received 98% “excellent” rating. Information provided to the patient was assessed as 91% “excellent”, 8% “satisfactory”, and 1% “poor”. Response to advice line inquiries received 54% “excellent”, 18% “satisfactory”, and 2% “poor” rating (26% of responders answered “non-applicable”). Finally, overall satisfaction was rated at 93%, with, crucially, no service user providing a “poor” rating. Conclusion We conducted a patient survey to assess overall satisfaction of our new fast track GCA pathway, ultimately aiming at improving our service. The overwhelming majority of the feedback was positive, but we focused and acted on suggestions. Following the survey, we have a) designed a GCA “passport” with useful information for newly diagnosed patients; b) revisited the advice line with a modified information leaflet for this service; c) endeavoured to optimise the referrals process via education sessions on GCA for Hospital and Primary Care clinicians. Following a period of intervention, we will be reassessing patient satisfaction, aiming to continue improving our service. Disclosure A. Hall: None. P. Kamperidis: None. H. Perera: None. S. Panthakalam: None.

BT19 The rising dermatology advice and guidance pandemic: building a workforce group with nationally implantable solutions that led to significant improvements over a 10-week period

BT16 BT17 Dermatology advice and guidance: a service evaluation

BT12 Great expectations: implementing artificial intelligence software into a regional skin cancer teledermatology service

BT03 A picture paints a thousand words: simple solutions for optimizing the flow of urgent skin cancer referrals

BT39 Teledermatology assessment of community skin lesion referrals: insights, challenges and recommendations

BT06 Using artificial intelligence to triage skin cancer referrals: outcomes from a pilot study

PA18 Audit of direct booking of urgent dermatology slots by the emergency department

BT25 Successfully utilizing a novel teledermatology pathway in a suspected skin cancer clinic: improving patient experience and reducing time from referral to assessment

DE02 Honing in on clinician needs: a grassroots development of an educational resource for dermatologists

BT41 Piloting a hospital-based teledermatology and artificial intelligence service for urgent suspected skin cancer alongside an established community-based teledermatology advice and guidance service

Cultivation of a learning culture in general practice: an educational intervention

BT35 Quality improvement project: modernizing the inpatient dermatology handover

BT31 The dermatology department without walls: how teledermatology unmasks unmet need in coastal ‘deserts of provision’

Asking the generalist - evaluation of a General Practice rounding and consult service

Is an online skin cancer toolkit an effective way to educate primary care physicians about skin cancer diagnosis and referral?

A Superclinic model for tackling skin cancer referrals

Poster presentationsDE06 Incorporating the ‘clinical teacher’ role in job plans: a way to increase medical students’ hands-on experience?

BT28 Analysis of a single practitioner’s teledermatology processing decisions in an established teledermatology service over a 12-month period

Experience of implementing and delivering group consultations in UK general practice: a qualitative study

DE04 Using an ‘umbrella clinic’ format to optimize educational experiences for trainees and clinical supervisors in dermatology

P056 Patient Satisfaction Survey of a Newly Set-Up Fast Track Giant Cell Arteritis Service in a District General Hospital