Visualization of small brain nuclei with a high-spatial resolution, clinically available whole-body PET scanner
Yuki Shinohara,Masanobu Ibaraki,Keisuke Matsubara,Kaoru Sato,Hiroyuki Yamamoto,Toshibumi Kinoshita
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-023-01886-1
2023-11-21
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Abstract:Abstract Objective To verify the visibility of physiological 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) uptake in nuclei in and around the brainstem by a whole-body (WB) silicon photomultiplier positron emission tomography (SiPM-PET) scanner with point-spread function (PSF) reconstruction using various iteration numbers. Methods Ten healthy subjects (5 men, 5 women; mean age, 56.0 ± 5.0 years) who underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT using a WB SiPM-PET scanner and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain including a spin-echo three-dimensional sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) and a 3D-T1 magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (T1-MPRAGE) images were enrolled. Each acquired PET image was reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) with iteration numbers of 4, 16, 64, and 256 (subset 5 fixed) + time-of-flight (TOF) + PSF. The reconstructed PET images and 3D-FLAIR images for each subject were registered to individual T1-MPRAGE volumes using normalized mutual information criteria. For each MR-coregistered individual PET image, the pattern of FDG uptake in the inferior olivary nuclei (ION), dentate nuclei (DN), midbrain raphe nuclei (MRN), inferior colliculi (IC), mammillary bodies (MB), red nuclei (RN), subthalamic nuclei (STN), lateral geniculate nuclei (LGN), medial geniculate nuclei (MGN), and superior colliculi (SC) was visually classified into the following three categories: good, clearly distinguishable FDG accumulation; fair, obscure contour of FDG accumulation; poor, FDG accumulation indistinguishable from surrounding uptake. Results Among individual 18 F-FDG PET images with OSEM iterations of 4, 16, 64, and 256 + TOF + PSF, the iteration numbers that showed the best visibility in each structure were as follows: ION, MRN, LGN, MGN, and SC, iteration 64; DN, iteration 16; IC, iterations 16, 64, and 256; MB, iterations 64 and 256; and RN and STN, iterations 16 and 64, respectively. Of the four iterations, the 18 F-FDG PET image of iteration 64 visualized FDG accumulation in small structures in and around the brainstem most clearly (good, 98 structures; fair, 2 structures). Conclusions A clinically available WB SiPM-PET scanner is useful for visualizing physiological FDG uptake in small brain nuclei, using a sufficiently high number of iterations for OSEM with TOF and PSF reconstructions.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging