Abstract:This study optimizes multidimensional variables in extrusion printing. The bio‐ink development process accelerates material and process selection, enhances molding resolution, and reduces costs related to scaffold manufacturing. The research focuses on the mechanical properties and tissue printing after cell addition, demonstrating improved fidelity and stability in printed nose tissue. These findings validate the feasibility and potential of the process in tissue engineering. Extrusion‐based 3D printing technology is currently demonstrating considerable potential in the field of tissue engineering scaffolds, enabling the construction of in vitro models with complex structures and functions using a wide range of biomaterials and cells at a low cost. In recent years, researchers have spent considerable effort developing novel bio‐inks and employing a greater variety of cell sources to enhance biological compatibility and functionality. However, the majority of current bio‐ink materials are unprintable due to their low viscosity and long curing time, as well as insufficient shape fidelity before the secondary cross‐linking process. The study aims to bridge this gap by optimizing the material ratios and predicting the printing process before work. This article presents new strategies for the design, fabrication, and analysis of a new composite bio‐ink material. The optimal ink ratios are verified by a design of experiments (DOE) experimental design and evaluation metrics for printing printability (Pr) values. A machine learning model is used to predict the ink printing area and determine the printing process parameters. The influence mechanism of ink materials with different concentrations of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) ratios on printed fibers is investigated. Finally, the optimal results are used as an example to demonstrate the printability of multilayer stents. Thus, the design approach allows for the rapid and cost‐effective exploration of novel ink ratios, while also providing higher fidelity and more accurate process metrics for the fabrication of tissue structures with multidimensional variables.

3D Printed Organisms Enabled by Aspiration‐Assisted Adaptive Strategies

Design of a High Precision Multichannel 3D Bioprinter

Freeform Inkjet Printing of Cellular Structures with Bifurcations.

3D Bioprinting: A Novel Avenue for Manufacturing Tissues and Organs

3D Printed Functional and Biological Materials on Moving Freeform Surfaces

Freeform laser and inkjet printing of biological constructs

Bioprint: A Liquid Deposition Printing System for Natural Actuators

Emerging 4D Printing Strategies for Next-Generation Tissue Regeneration and Medical Devices

Rapid Assembling Organ Prototypes with Controllable Cell-Laden Multi-Scale Sheets

Three-dimensional printing of biological matters

A Multifunctional 3D Bioprinting System for Construction of Complex Tissue Structure Scaffolds: Design and Application

3D bioprinting for organ and organoid models and disease modeling

Two‐Photon Laser Printing to Mechanically Stimulate Multicellular Systems in 3D

Expanding Embedded 3D Bioprinting Capability for Engineering Complex Organs with Freeform Vascular Networks (adv. Mater. 22/2023)

3D Embedded Printing of Complex Biological Structures with Supporting Bath of Pluronic F-127

Expanding Embedded 3D Bioprinting Capability for Engineering Complex Organs with Freeform Vascular Networks

3D Bioprinting: Airflow‐Assisted 3D Bioprinting of Human Heterogeneous Microspheroidal Organoids with Microfluidic Nozzle (small 39/2018)

New Strategies for High Efficiency and Precision Bioprinting by DOE Technology and Machine Learning

Bio-Printing of Living Organized Tissues Using an Inkjet Technology

3D Cell Printing of Tissue/Organ-Mimicking Constructs for Therapeutic and Drug Testing Applications

A multi-axis robot-based bioprinting system supporting natural cell function preservation and cardiac tissue fabrication