Abstract:With the development of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, a new generation of editing methods that convert specific bases has enabled precise single-base mutations. To date, conversion of cytosine to thymidine and adenine to guanine has been achieved using the cytidine deaminase APOBEC1 and adenosine deaminase (TadA), respectively. However, the base editing efficiency can be unacceptably low in some cell types or at certain target loci. One reason might be the lack of a selective pressure against the survival of non-edited cells. Few studies on ABE in prokaryotes have been reported, probably due to the relatively low editing efficiency of TadA. Improving the editing efficiency is the key for establishing base editing techniques and especially the ABE technologies. In this work, a selective pressure against non-edited cells was implemented to increase the base editing efficiency. Firstly, we fused nCas9 or dCas9 with TadA to compare the editing efficiency of nCas9-TadA and dCas9-TadA fusion complexes in the model prokaryote Escherichia coli. While nCas9-TadA was able to achieve A to G base editing (ABE) with a moderate efficiency, dCas9-TadA had a very low efficiency. To enrich for edited cells and increase the base-editing efficiency, we utilized the induction of double-strand breaks by active Cas9, which leads to the death of prokaryotic cells. By introducing an inducible active Cas9 with the same editing gRNA as the nCas9-TadA in the base editing process, the cells with non-edited target bases remained vulnerable to Cas9 and were eliminated. Thus, a double-check base editing (DBE) method was established, which significantly improved the editing efficiency of ABE in E. coli, reaching 99.0% for some sites. By placing a selective pressure against non-edited cells, the DBE strategy might also be applied to various scenarios to increase the efficiency of many different base editing targets or even for epigenetic DNA modification techniques.

Development of a universal antibiotic resistance screening system for efficient enrichment of C-to-G and A-to-G base editing

Development of a Universal Antibiotic Resistance Screening Reporter for Improving Efficiency of Cytosine and Adenine Base Editing

[Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-based multiplex base editing in Corynebacterium glutamicum].

Efficient C-to-G Base Editing with Improved Target Compatibility Using Engineered Deaminase-nCas9 Fusions.

OUP accepted manuscript

Development of a Versatile Nuclease Prime Editor with Upgraded Precision

ACBE, a new base editor for simultaneous C-to-T and A-to-G substitutions in mammalian systems

Double-Check Base Editing for Efficient A to G Conversions

Optimization of C-to-G base editors with sequence context preference predictable by machine learning methods

Human Cell Based Directed Evolution of Adenine Base Editors with Improved Efficiency

Precise base editing with CC context-specificity using engineered human APOBEC3G-nCas9 fusions

Multiplexed base editing through Cas12a variant-mediated cytosine and adenine base editors

Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells

Efficient and High-Fidelity Base Editor with Expanded PAM Compatibility for Cytidine Dinucleotide

Enrichment Reporter System of Genome Editing Positive Cells

Re-engineering the adenine deaminase TadA-8e for efficient and specific CRISPR-based cytosine base editing

Improved plant cytosine base editors with high editing activity, purity, and specificity

Eliminating Base-Editor-induced Genome-Wide and Transcriptome-Wide Off-Target Mutations

Efficient base editing by RNA-guided cytidine base editors (CBEs) in pigs

Enhancing glycosylase base-editor activity by fusion to transactivation modules

Engineered DNase-inactive Cpf1 Variants to Improve Targeting Scope for Base Editing in E. Coli