Abstract:Mental health in the workplace today are ubiquitous and cause significant dysfunction in organizations (turnover, absenteeism, presenteeism, early retirement, long sick…). Statements of professional unfitness for depression is of particular concern. The human and financial costs associated with the support of mental disability is important, in France it is estimated to 14 billion euros. Mental disorder in the workplace also has a significant impact on the individual. If not always leads to actual inability to work, it usually causes, from the disclosure of the disorder, professional inequalities related to perceived environmental work disability. Therefore, this type of public remains largely on the sidelines of a stable occupation and all forms of recognition and undergo disqualifications and some forms of exclusion. Instead of saving, the workplace can promote relapse and even constitute a real obstacle to improving health. These exclusionary behavior result in persistent employment resistance in France and elsewhere, especially because of the prejudice of employers. These resistances persist despite legal obligations in this regard (e.g. in France: Law of 11 February 2005 on Equal Rights and Opportunities). To address the issue of sustainable professional inclusion (recruitment, integration and job preservation) of people with mental disabilities, studies are especially developed for the rehabilitation in the workplace of this public or accompanying us in their professional reintegration into protected workplaces. We propose a reflection on the adaptation of knowledge about psychological processes of hiring discrimination in the particular employment situation of people with mental disabilities in ordinary workplaces. Researches on social representations, stereotypes and prejudices applied in the workplace help to understand the negative attitudes and resistance to the hiring of people with mental disabilities despite regulations. Representations of professional efficiency, cognitive bias in social perception, personological expectations and responsibilities about the success of the employment integration of new employees strongly impact the hiring and integration behaviors of actors of the company. Nevertheless, the influence of the organizational context was highlighted in the researches in psychology of organizations. Recruitment and integration practices implemented by organizations, the procedures used to recruit (procedural justice) and the quality of interpersonal treatment of individuals (interpersonal justice) are essential elements of socialization. Disability is recognized as a particularly salient dimension and effective in activating cognitive processes biased. Individual and/or collective courses of action as persuasive communication, suppression and dilution of stereotypes, self-regulation of prejudice, intergroup contact and the sharing of values, affirmative action, promoting diversity, are proposed to modify these psychological barriers. However, their effectiveness is moderated by various individual factors such as the level of prejudice of actors, their previous work experience of disabled workers, their commitment to the values promoted by the organization for example, or organizational and structural factors such as the characteristics of the organization, the degree of formalization of hiring procedures, social policy of the organization and how it is conveyed and received by workers… These studies support the conclusion that the process of professional inclusion of public considered as "non-standard" is complex. These tracks remain to be tested under the mental disability taking into account the type of company and characteristics of actors that constitute them.

Reducing Discrimination against Individuals with Mental Impairments: Influence of Section 503

[Psychological barriers to professional inclusion of people with mental disabilities]

Needs of human resource professionals in implicit bias and disability inclusion training: A focus group study

The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence

The importance of disability representation to address implicit bias in the workplace

The language of inclusion: A randomized trial of how DEI statements influence hiring practices for people with visible and invisible disabilities

Is Discrimination against disabled job candidates increased by previously acquired non-discriminatory moral credentials?

Examining the effectiveness of interventions to reduce discriminatory behavior at work: An attitude dimension consistency perspective

Perceptions and Bias of Small Business Leaders in Employing People with Different Types of Disabilities

Can Brief Video Trainings Reduce Bias and Improve Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Applicants with Disabilities?

How Stigma and Discrimination Influences Nursing Care of Persons Diagnosed with Mental Illness: A Systematic Review

A mixed methods study of employers' and employees' evaluations of job seekers with a mental illness, disability, or of a cultural minority

Strategic insights from a Delphi study: enhancing employment for multiply marginalized people with disabilities

Don't let Ricci v. DeStefano Hold You Back: A Bias-Aware Legal Solution to the Hiring Paradox

Disability-based Discrimination in Organizations

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

Utilizing Latent Class Analysis to Assess the Association of Intersectional Stigma on Mental Health Outcomes Among Young Adult Black, Indigenous, and Sexual Minority Women of Color

Using the Americans with Disabilities Act to the advantage of persons with severe and persistent mental illness: What rehabilitation counselors need to know

Experiences of researchers with disabilities at academic institutions in the United States

Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability

"Going Back in the Closet": Addressing Discrimination Against Sexual and Gender Minority Residents in Long-Term Services and Supports by Providing Culturally Responsive Care