Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

On the impact of multi-dimensional local differential privacy on fairness

On the Impact of Multi-dimensional Local Differential Privacy on Fairness

(Local) Differential Privacy has NO Disparate Impact on Fairness

A Systematic and Formal Study of the Impact of Local Differential Privacy on Fairness: Preliminary Results

On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential Privacy

Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness

Privacy for Fairness: Information Obfuscation for Fair Representation Learning with Local Differential Privacy

Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Survey

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Differential Privacy in Privacy-Preserving Big Data and Learning: Challenge and Opportunity

An Empirical Analysis of Fairness Notions under Differential Privacy

Local Differential Privacy for data collection and analysis

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Local Differential Privacy and Its Applications: A Comprehensive Survey

Differential Privacy Under Class Imbalance: Methods and Empirical Insights

Local Privacy-preserving Mechanisms and Applications in Machine Learning

Differential Privacy for Deep and Federated Learning: A Survey

Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair Learning

Partial sensitivity analysis in differential privacy

Task-aware Privacy Preservation for Multi-dimensional Data

Deciphering the Interplay between Local Differential Privacy, Average Bayesian Privacy, and Maximum Bayesian Privacy