Abstract:Background This meta-regression aims to investigate risk factors for abdominal hernia and bulge in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and the effect of prophylactic mesh placement on postoperative complications. Methods A systematic search was conducted in July of 2022 in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Seventy-four studies published between 2000 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four studies were included in the analysis for bulge and 71 studies were included in the analysis for hernia. Meta-regressions were run on the proportion of patients experiencing hernia or bulge to assess for patient risk factors and the role of prophylactic mesh placement. Proportions were transformed using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine method. Results The average rates of hernia and bulge after DIEP flaps were found to be 0.18% and 1.26%, respectively. Increased age (β = 0.0059, p = 0.0117), prior abdominal surgery (β = 0.0008, p = 0.046), and pregnancy history (β = −0.0015, p = 00001) were significantly associated with hernia. Active smoking (β = 0.0032, p = 00262) and pregnancy history (β = 0.0019, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with bulge. Neither the perforator vessel laterality nor the number of perforator vessels harvested had any association with hernia or bulge. Prophylactic mesh placement was not associated with hernia or bulge. Conclusion Understanding the comorbidities associated with hernia or bulge following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, such as advanced age, prior abdominal surgery, pregnancy history, and active smoking status, allows surgeons to proactively identify and educate high-risk patients. Future studies may further explore whether prophylactic mesh placement offers patients any benefit. N.R. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. K.A.H. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. R.F-A. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. O.L-A. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. K.I. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. J.T. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. E.M.R. : statistical analysis. D.E.K. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, project administration. D.S. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, project administration. G.K. : conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, project administration. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. Received: 10 October 2023 Accepted: 22 June 2024 Article published online: 17 July 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

DIEP Donor Site Satisfaction between Patients with and without History of Pregnancy

Long-term Donor Site-related Quality of Life after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction

Evaluation of free DIEP flap complications in the setting of previous gynecological operations

Long-Term Pregnancy Outcomes of Patients with Diffuse Adenomyosis after Double-Flap Adenomyomectomy

[Impact of the number of pregnancies on the venous outflow of DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: A clinical and CT-scan study]

Patient-reported and surgical outcomes of Profunda Artery Perforator (PAP) Flap Breast Reconstructions compared to Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) using BREAST-Q

Drain-free donor site in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator free flap: A single-surgeon experience

Shifting Towards Total Drainless Approach in DIEP Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Safety

Abstract PO2-22-09: The impact of blood loss and blood pressure management in DIEP flap surgery– a retrospective analysis of 206 patients

Reducing donor-site complications in DIEP flap breast reconstruction with closed incisional negative pressure therapy: A cost-benefit analysis

“DIEP Flap vs PAP Flap vs LAP Flap: A Propensity Matched Analysis of Aesthetic Outcomes, Complications, and Satisfaction”

The Influence of the Superficial Venous System on DIEP Flap Drainage in Breast Reconstruction

Predictors of Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using DIEP Flaps: Implications for Management

Optimizing Intraflap Anastomosis of Conjoined Bilateral DIEP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Planning, Execution and Outcomes in 201 patients

Observation on the therapeutic effects of breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap after resection of breast cancer

The impact of physical activity on patient-reported outcomes following deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction

Efficacy of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on reducing surgical disparities related to overweight/obesity in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction

Fat Necrosis in Single Perforator Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery and Superficial Epigastric Artery Perforator Free Flaps: A Prospective Randomized Study

A retrospective study of 51 cases with abdominal based free flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer

Risk Factors for Step-off Deformity of the Donor Site Following Abdominal Flap-based Breast Reconstruction

A DIEP Dive into Patient Risk Factors for Hernia and Bulge Development: A Meta-regression