Abstract:Legal judgment prediction (LJP) is a significant task in legal intelligence, which aims to assist the judges and determine the judgment result based on the case's fact description. The judgment result consists of law articles, charge, and prison term. The law articles serve as the basis for the charge and the prison term, which can be divided into two types, named as charge-related law article and term-related law article, respectively. Recently, many methods have been proposed and made tremendous progress in LJP. However, the existing methods only focus on the prediction of the charge-related law articles, ignoring the term-related law articles (e.g., laws about lenient treatment), which limits the performance in the prison term prediction. In this paper, following the actual legal process, we expand the law article prediction as a multi-label classification task that includes both the charge-related law articles and term-related law articles and propose a novel multi-law aware LJP (ML-LJP) method to improve the performance of LJP. Given the case's fact description, firstly, the label (e.g., law article and charge) definitions in the Code of Law are used to transform the representation of the fact into several label-specific representations and make the prediction of the law articles and the charge. To distinguish the similar content of different label definitions, contrastive learning is conducted in the training. Then, a graph attention network (GAT) is applied to learn the interactions among the multiple law articles for the prediction of the prison term. Since numbers (e.g., amount of theft and weight of drugs) are important for LJP but often ignored by conventional encoders, we design a corresponding number representation method to locate and better represent these effective numbers. Extensive experiments on real-world dataset show that our method achieves the best results compared to the state-of-the-art models, especially in the task of prison term prediction where ML-LJP achieves a 10.07% relative improvement over the best baseline.

R 2 : A Novel Recall & Ranking Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction

Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework.

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage CaseRepresentation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Iteratively Questioning and Answering for Interpretable Legal Judgment Prediction.

LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration

Judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning for numerical legal judgment prediction

Distinguish Confusion in Legal Judgment Prediction via Revised Relation Knowledge

Legal Judgment Prediction via Heterogeneous Graphs and Knowledge of Law Articles

ML-LJP: Multi-Law Aware Legal Judgment Prediction

FCA-LJP: A Method Based on Formal Concept Analysis for Case Judgment Prediction

LegalDuet: Learning Effective Representations for Legal Judgment Prediction through a Dual-View Legal Clue Reasoning

A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges

Contrastive Learning for Legal Judgment Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) Amid the Advent of Autonomous AI Legal Reasoning

Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehension

Legal Judgment Prediction: A Survey of the State of the Art

A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction

Judgment Prediction Based on Case Life Cycle

Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural Networks