Quantitative analysis of difference in CH 4 and CO 2 adsorption capacity in coal based on adsorption model

Xiaoxi Cheng,Yuanping Cheng,Biao Hu,Xinxin He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104541
IF: 5.285
2022-06-01
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Abstract:Understanding the difference between CH 4 and CO 2 adsorption mechanisms is essential for better implementation of CO 2 Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Recovery (CO 2 -ECBM). In this paper, with the help of low-pressure physisorption of N 2 at 77 K and CO 2 at 273 K, an adsorption model based on microporous filling and surface covering has been used to estimate the gas adsorption capacity. The model was validated by CH 4 and CO 2 high-pressure adsorption experiments at 303 K and gas pressure up to 6 MPa using four coal samples with different ranks. Then the model-based adsorption space and bulk density were used to determine the factors affecting the differences between CH 4 and CO 2 adsorption. Results show that the correlation between the model calculated adsorption capacity and the experimental adsorption capacity is 0.952 for CH 4 and 0.967 for CO 2 , which supports the reliability of the model. The microporous filling is found to account for 85.06–93.41% and 91.87-97.15% of the total gas adsorption capacity for CH 4 and CO 2 , respectively, meaning that should be the main adsorption behavior in coal. In terms of adsorption space, it should also be noted that for these four samples, 2.85–13.88% of the CO 2 is adsorbed within 0.33–0.38 nm which is inaccessible to CH 4 . Within different pore sizes at the microporous filling stage, the bulk densities of CH 4 and CO 2 are 19.737–31.171 mol/L and 30.197–47.885 mol/L, respectively; the bulk density of CH 4 is 1.5 times bigger than that of CO 2 for the same pore size. Based on these findings, a method for calculating adsorption phase density has been proposed.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?