Abstract:We calculate the formation cross sections of transactinides (superheavy elements), as well as heavy actinides (No and Lr), which have been or might be obtained in fusion reactions with the evaporation of only one neutron. We use both more realistic fusion barrier and survival probability of the compound nucleus in comparison with the original phenomenological model [Phys. Rev. C 59, 2634 (1999)] that prompted the Berkeley experiment on the synthesis of a new superheavy element 118 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1104 (1999)]. Calculations are performed for asymmetric and symmetric target-projectile combinations and for reactions with stable and radioactive-ion beams. The formation cross sections measured at GSI-Darmstadt for transactinides and heavy actinides, as well as that for superheavy element 118 reported by the LBNL-Berkeley group, are reproduced within a factor of 2.4, on average. Based on the obtained relatively large cross sections, we predict that optimal reactions with stable beams for the synthesis of so far unobserved superheavy elements 119, 120, and 121 are 209Bi(86Kr, 1n)294119, 208Pb(88Sr, 1n)295120, and 209Bi(88Sr, 1n)296121, respectively. This is because of the magic of both the target and the projectile that leads to larger Q value and, consequently, lower effective fusion barrier with larger transmission probability. The same effect is responsible for relatively large cross sections predicted for the symmetric reactions 136Xe(124Sn, 1n)259Rf, 136Xe(136Xe, 1n)271Hs,138Ba(136Xe, 1n)273110, and 140Ce(136Xe, 1n)275112. Although shell effects in the magic nuclei 124Sn, 136Xe, 138Ba, and 140Ce are not as strong as in 208Pb and 209Bi, they act on both the target and the projectile and lead to the prediction of measurable cross sections.

Non-Observation of the Production of Superheavy Nuclei in the Reaction of $^{86]$Kr with $^{208}$Pb

Confirmation of Super Heavy Element Production in [sup 48]ca Induced Fusion Reactions A Handshake of Physics and Chemistry for Element 112

Mechanisms of Carrier-Induced Ferromagnetism in Diluted Magnetic Semiconductors

Structure of Superheavy Elements Suggested in the Reaction Of86krwith208pb

Investigation of neutron-rich 197 Au projectile fragments with Schottky mass spectrometry at the ESR

Towards the Discovery of New Elements: Production of Livermorium (Z=116) with 50Ti

Response to "Discovery of the element with atomic number 112" by Robert C. Barber, Heinz W. Gaggeler, Paul J. Karol, Hiromichi Nakahara, Emanuele Vardaci and Erich Vogt (PAC-REP-08-03-05)

Observation of the New Neutron-Rich Nuclidehg208

Microscopic study of the production of neutron-rich isotopes near in the multinucleon transfer reactions

Discovery of Rb-72: A Nuclear Sandbank Beyond the Proton Drip Line

Formation of superheavy elements in cold fusion reactions

A Detail Investigation on the Synthesis of Superheavy Element Z = 119

Exploringα-decay Chains and Cluster Radioactivities of Superheavy 293-295119 Isotopes

Generalized r-matrix structure and algebro-geometric solution for integrable systems

$ {}^{164} \mathrm{Pb} $: A possible heaviest $ N = Z $ doubly-magic nucleus

The -decay of <SUP>70</SUP>Kr into <SUP>70</SUP>Br: Restoration of the pseudo-SU(4) symmetry

Exploring -decay chains and cluster radioactivities of superheavy 119 isotopes

Neutron-deficient Superheavy Nuclei Obtained in the Pu240+Ca48 Reaction

Attempt to Synthesize the Proton-Unbound 182,183bi Isotopes

Attempt to synthesize the proton-unbound isotopes

Erratum to: Study of the 242Pu + 48Ca Reaction at Super Heavy Element Factory