Measuring interpersonal trauma: Development and validation of the German version of the victimization experience schedule (VES)

Armin Drusko,Malika Renz,Hannah Schmidt,Michelle Rosin,Joe Simon,Eva Beiner,Monica Charalambides,Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg,Rolf-Detlef Treede,Heike Tost,Jonas Tesarz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111626
IF: 4.62
2024-02-26
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Abstract:Objective Interpersonal victimization experiences (VEs) significantly affect mental and physical health, particularly in disorders associated with life-time adversities, like fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and major depressive disorder (MDD). However, assessing VEs comprehensively remains challenging due to limited tools that encompass sub-traumatic events, such as bullying or discrimination, and contextual dimensions. We aimed to address this gap by validating the Victimization Experience Schedule (VES) in German, examining its reliability, and assessing VEs in clinical populations with FMS and MDD. Methods We investigated the relationship between VEs and clinical symptoms in individuals with FMS, MDD and healthy controls ( N = 105) in a case-control study. We also analyzed correlations between different types of VEs and categories of early childhood abuse and posttraumatic-stress-disorder instruments. Additionally, we validated our findings in an independent sample of individuals with FMS ( N = 97) from a clinical study. Results We observed excellent inter-rater reliability ( K w = 0.90–0.99), and VEs assessed using the VES were in alignment with subcategories of early childhood abuse. The prevalence of VEs extended beyond the categories covered by traditional survey instruments and was higher in individuals with MDD (4.0 ± 2.6) and FMS (5.9 ± 3.1) compared to controls (1.5 ± 1.7). We consistently identified a significant association between the number of VEs, the associated subjective distress, and clinical scores. Furthermore, distinct correlation patterns between VEs and clinical outcomes emerged across different cohorts. Conclusion Our study emphasizes the VES's value in understanding VEs within MDD and FMS. These experiences span from traumatic to sub-traumatic and correlate with posttraumatic-stress and clinical symptoms, underscoring the VES's importance as an assessment tool.
psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?