Determination of Performance of Different Pad Materials and Energy Consumption Values of Direct Evaporative Cooler

Tomasz Jakubowski,Sedat Boyacı,Joanna Kocięcka,Atılgan Atılgan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122811

IF: 3.2

2024-06-08

Energies

Abstract:The purpose of this study is to determine the performances of luffa and greenhouse shading netting (which can be used as alternatives to commercial cellulose pads, that are popular for cooling greenhouses), the contribution of external shading to the evaporative cooling performance, and the energy consumption of the direct evaporative cooler. In this experiment, eight different applications were evaluated: natural ventilation (NV), natural ventilation combined with external shading net (NV + ESN), cellulose pad (CP), cellulose pad combined with external shading net (CP + ESN), luffa pad (LP), luffa pad combined with external shading net (LP + ESN), shading net pad (SNP), and shading net pad combined with external shading net (SNP + ESN). The cooling efficiencies of CP, CP + ESN, LP, LP + ESN, SNP, and SNP + ESN were found to be 37.6%, 45.0%, 38.9%, 41.2%, 24.4%, 29.1%, respectively. Moreover, their cooling capacities were 2.6 kW, 3.0 kW, 2.8 kW, 3.0 kW, 1.7 kW, 2.0 kW, respectively. The system water consumption values were 2.9, 3.1, 2.8, 3.2, 2.4, 2.4 l h−1, respectively. The performance coefficients of the system were determined to be 10.2, 12.1, 11.3, 11.9, 6.6, 7.8. The system's electricity consumption per unit area was 0.15 kWh m−2. As a result of the study, it was determined that commercially used cellulose pads have advantages over luffa and shading net materials. However, luffa pads can be a good alternative to cellulose pads, considering their local availability, initial cost, cooling efficiency, and capacity.

energy & fuels

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the issue of regulating the internal environment of greenhouses during high summer temperatures, particularly by improving the performance of direct evaporative cooling systems through the use of different padding materials and evaluating their impact on reducing greenhouse temperature, increasing relative humidity, and overall system energy consumption.

The main objectives of the study include:
1. **Evaluating the performance of different padding materials (such as Luffa and shade net) as alternatives to commercially used cellulose pads**, particularly in terms of cooling efficiency, cooling capacity, and operating costs.
2. **Investigating the contribution of external shading to evaporative cooling performance**, i.e., how external shade nets affect cooling efficiency when combined with different types of padding materials.
3. **Measuring the energy consumption of direct evaporative cooling systems** to determine the overall energy efficiency of the system when using different padding materials.

Through experimental comparisons of eight different ventilation configurations, including natural ventilation, natural ventilation with external shading, cellulose pad, cellulose pad with external shading, Luffa pad, Luffa pad with external shading, shade net pad, and shade net pad with external shading, the study found that cellulose pads performed well on most metrics. However, Luffa pads were also considered a viable alternative due to their local availability, lower initial cost, good cooling efficiency, and capacity.

In summary, the study aims to explore low-cost and effective evaporative cooling technologies to improve the internal environmental conditions of greenhouses, especially during hot summers, thereby promoting crop growth and increasing yield.