Abstract:We revisit the recent debate on the evidence for an overtone in the black hole ringdown of GW150914 using an independent data-analysis pipeline. By gating and inpainting the data, we discard the contamination from earlier parts of the gravitational wave signal before ringdown. This enables parameter estimation to be conducted in the frequency domain, which is mathematically equivalent to the time domain method. We keep the settings as similar as possible to the previous studies by Cotesta et al. <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2201.00822" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00822">arXiv:2201.00822</a> and Isi et al. <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1905.00869" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00869">arXiv:1905.00869</a> <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2202.02941" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02941">arXiv:2202.02941</a> which yielded conflicting results on the Bayes factor of the overtone. Our aim is to understand how different data analysis systematics, including sampling rates, erroneous timestamps, the frequency resolution of the noise power spectrum, and the parameterization of ringdown amplitudes, would influence the statistical significance of an overtone. Our main results indicate the following: (i) a low-resolution estimation of the noise power spectrum tends to diminish the significance of overtones, (ii) adjusting the start time to a later digitized point reduces the significance of overtones, and (iii) overtone evidence varies with different sampling rates if the start time is too early, indicating that the overtone is a poor model, hence we propose a convergence test to verify the validity of an overtone model. With these issues addressed, we find the Bayes factors for the overtone to range from $10$ to $26$ in a range of times centered at the best-fit merger time of GW150914, which supports the existence of an overtone in agreement with the conclusions of Isi et al. <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1905.00869" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00869">arXiv:1905.00869</a> <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2202.02941" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02941">arXiv:2202.02941</a>.

Probing chromatic onsets of gravitational wave overtones

A gating-and-inpainting perspective on GW150914 ringdown overtone: understanding the data analysis systematics

Low evidence for ringdown overtone in GW150914 when marginalizing over time and sky location uncertainty

Reanalyzing the ringdown signal of GW150914 using the F-statistic method

Enriching the Symphony of Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes by Tuning Higher Harmonics

Testing the No-Hair Theorem with GW150914

Theory-agnostic searches for non-gravitational modes in black hole ringdown

Fundamental Tone and Overtones of Quasinormal Modes in Ringdown Gravitational Waves: A Detailed Study in Black Hole Perturbation

Striking the right tone: toward a self-consistent framework for measuring black hole ringdowns

Toward a self-consistent framework for measuring black hole ringdowns

Quasinormal modes of the Kerr-Newman black hole: GW150914 and fundamental physics implications

Estimating False Alarm Rates of Sub-Dominant Quasi-normal Modes in GW190521

Searching for ringdown higher modes with a numerical relativity-informed post-merger model

Role of black hole quasinormal mode overtones for ringdown analysis

Iterative extraction of overtones from black hole ringdown

A multimode quasi-normal spectrum from a perturbed black hole

The Ringdown of GW190521: Hints of Multiple Quasinormal Modes with a Precessional Interpretation

Comment on "Analysis of Ringdown Overtones in GW150914''