Global Sources of Fine Particulate Matter: Interpretation of PM2.5 Chemical Composition Observed by SPARTAN using a Global Chemical Transport Model

Crystal L Weagle, Graydon Snider, Chi Li, Aaron Van Donkelaar, Sajeev Philip, Paul Bissonnette, Jaqueline Burke, John Jackson, Robyn Latimer, Emily Stone, Ihab Abboud, Clement Akoshile, Nguyen Xuan Anh, Jeffrey Robert Brook, Aaron Cohen, Jinlu Dong, Mark D Gibson, Derek Griffith, Kebin B He, Brent N Holben, Ralph Kahn, Christoph A Keller, Jong Sung Kim, Nofel Lagrosas, Puji Lestari, Yeo Lik Khian, Yang Liu, Eloise A Marais, J Vanderlei Martins, Amit Misra, Ulfi Muliane, Rizki Pratiwi, Eduardo J Quel, Abdus Salam, Lior Segev, Sachchida N Tripathi, Chien Wang, Qiang Zhang, Michael Brauer, Yinon Rudich, Randall V Martin
2018-09-14
Abstract:Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a leading risk factor for the global burden of disease. However, uncertainty remains about PM2.5 sources. We use a global chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem) simulation for 2014, constrained by satellite-based estimates of PM2.5 to interpret globally dispersed PM2.5 mass and composition measurements from the ground-based surface particulate matter network (SPARTAN). Measured site mean PM2.5 composition varies substantially for secondary inorganic aerosols (2.4–19.7 μg/m3), mineral dust (1.9–14.7 μg/m3), residual/organic matter (2.1–40.2 μg/m3), and black carbon (1.0–7.3 μg/m3). Interpretation of these measurements with the GEOS-Chem model yields insight into sources affecting each site. Globally, combustion sectors such as residential energy use (7.9 μg/m3), industry (6.5 μg/m3), and power generation (5.6 μg/m3) are leading sources of …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?