Prediction of stroke severity: systematic evaluation of lesion representations

Anna K. Bonkhoff,Alexander L. Cohen,William Drew,Michael A. Ferguson,Aaliya Hussain,Christopher Lin,Frederic L. W. V. J. Schaper,Anthony Bourached,Anne‐Katrin Giese,Lara C. Oliveira,Robert W. Regenhardt,Markus D. Schirmer,Christina Jern,Arne G. Lindgren,Jane Maguire,Ona Wu,Sahar Zafar,John Y. Rhee,Eyal Y. Kimchi,Maurizio Corbetta,Natalia S. Rost,Michael D. Fox,MRI‐GENIE and GISCOME Investigators and the International Stroke Genetics Consortium

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52215

IF: 5.43

2024-10-13

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

Abstract:Objective To systematically evaluate which lesion‐based imaging features and methods allow for the best statistical prediction of poststroke deficits across independent datasets. Methods We utilized imaging and clinical data from three independent datasets of patients experiencing acute stroke (N1 = 109, N2 = 638, N3 = 794) to statistically predict acute stroke severity (NIHSS) based on lesion volume, lesion location, and structural and functional disconnection with the lesion location using normative connectomes. Results We found that prediction models trained on small single‐center datasets could perform well using within‐dataset cross‐validation, but results did not generalize to independent datasets (median R2N1 = 0.2%). Performance across independent datasets improved using large single‐center training data (R2N2 = 15.8%) and improved further using multicenter training data (R2N3 = 24.4%). These results were consistent across lesion attributes and prediction models. Including either structural or functional disconnection in the models outperformed prediction based on volume or location alone (P

neurosciences,clinical neurology