Abstract:Both research and conventional wisdom suggest that, due to their relational orientation, women are less likely than men to engage in agentic and assertive behaviors, leading them to underperform in zero-sum, distributive negotiations where one party's gain is equivalent to the other party's loss. However, past research tends to neglect the costs of reaching impasse by excluding impasses from measures of negotiation performance. Departing from this convention, we incorporate the economic costs of impasses into measures of negotiation performance to provide a more holistic examination of negotiation outcomes. In so doing, we reveal a reversal of the oft-cited male performance advantage when obtaining an impasse is especially economically costly (as is the case when negotiators have weak negotiation alternatives). Specifically, we predicted that female negotiators would make less assertive first offers than men due to their more relational orientation and that these gender differences in offer assertiveness should result in women avoiding impasse more often than men. Since avoiding impasses should improve negotiation performance when negotiators are able to obtain a deal that is more valuable than their negotiation alternative, women's tendency to avoid impasses should improve their performance when negotiators have weak (vs. strong) alternatives. These predictions were supported in eight studies (three preregistered) across various negotiation contexts, comprising data from the television show Shark Tank (Study 1), four incentive-compatible negotiation simulations (Studies 2 and 3, Supplemental Studies), and a multistudy causal experimental chain (Supplemental Studies 4a-c). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

It hurts to ask

Helping Yourself Before Helping Others: How Sense of Control Promotes Charitable Behaviors

Factors that affect asker's pay intention in trilateral payment-based social Q&A platforms: From a benefit and cost perspective

Reciprocity Anxiety: Individual Differences in Feeling Discomfort in Reciprocity Situations

Game Theory Analysis of Self-Awareness and Politeness

Deciding Who Is Worthy of Help: Effect of the Probability of Reciprocity on Individuals' Willingness to Help Others

Halfway to My Request Is Not Halfway to My Heart: Underestimating Appreciation for Partial Help

How to Ask for a Favor: A Case Study on the Success of Altruistic Requests

The Volunteer’s Dilemma Explains the Bystander Effect

Why are we unwilling to help sometimes? Reconsideration and integration of the attribution-affect model and the arousal: cost-reward model

Promoting Fair Proposers, Fair Responders or Both? Cost-Efficient Interference in the Spatial Ultimatum Game

Deliberately ignoring inequality to avoid rejecting unfair offers

To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive

Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children

Victims of misfortune may not “deserve” help: A possible factor in victim-devaluation

High Impostors Are More Hesitant to Ask for Help

Avoiding the cost of your conscience: belief dependent preferences and information acquisition

Asking for less (but receiving more): Women avoid impasses and outperform men when negotiators have weak alternatives.

The Evolution Of Cooperation In The Presence Of Costs Of Information Transfer

How the Perceived Cost of Prosocial Action Inspires Observers to Contribute

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation