New-onset atrial fibrillation prediction: the HARMS2-AF risk score

Louise Segan,Rodrigo Canovas,Shane Nanayakkara,David Chieng,Sandeep Prabhu,Aleksandr Voskoboinik,Hariharan Sugumar,Liang-Han Ling,Geoff Lee,Joseph Morton,Andre LaGerche,David M Kaye,Prashanthan Sanders,Jonathan M Kalman,Peter M Kistler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad375
IF: 39.3
2023-06-26
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Lifestyle risk factors are a modifiable target in atrial fibrillation (AF) management. The relative contribution of individual lifestyle risk factors to AF development has not been described. Development and validation of an AF lifestyle risk score to identify individuals at risk of AF in the general population are the aims of the study. The UK Biobank (UKB) and Framingham Heart Study (FHS) are large prospective cohorts with outcomes measured >10 years. Incident AF was based on International Classification of Diseases version 10 coding. Prior AF was excluded. Cox proportional hazards regression identified independent AF predictors, which were evaluated in a multivariable model. A weighted score was developed in the UKB and externally validated in the FHS. Kaplan–Meier estimates ascertained the risk of AF development. Among 314 280 UKB participants, AF incidence was 5.7%, with median time to AF 7.6 years (interquartile range 4.5–10.2). Hypertension, age, body mass index, male sex, sleep apnoea, smoking, and alcohol were predictive variables (all P < 0.001); physical inactivity [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96–1.05, P = 0.80] and diabetes (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97–1.09, P = 0·38) were not significant. The HARMS 2 -AF score had similar predictive performance [area under the curve (AUC) 0.782] to the unweighted model (AUC 0.802) in the UKB. External validation in the FHS (AF incidence 6.0% of 7171 participants) demonstrated an AUC of 0.757 (95% CI 0.735–0.779). A higher HARMS 2 -AF score (≥5 points) was associated with a heightened AF risk (score 5–9: HR 12.79; score 10–14: HR 38.70). The HARMS 2 -AF risk model outperformed the Framingham-AF (AUC 0.568) and ARIC (AUC 0.713) risk models (both P < 0.001) and was comparable to the CHARGE-AF risk score (AUC 0.754, P = 0.73). The HARMS 2 -AF score is a novel lifestyle risk score which may help identify individuals at risk of AF in the general community and assist population screening. HARMS 2 -AF lifestyle risk score (left). Performance of the HARMS 2 -AF risk score in predicting the 5- and 10-year risk of AF development among the UKB and FHS (top right). Kaplan–Meier estimate of AF risk according to risk tertiles in the UKB (bottom right). AF, atrial fibrillation; AUC, area under the curve; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; FHS, Framingham Heart Study; HR, hazard ratio; UKB, UK Biobank.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?