Abstract:Local social interactions among individuals in animal groups generate collective behavior, allowing groups to adjust to changing conditions. Historically, scientists from different disciplines have taken different approaches to modeling collective behavior. We describe how each can contribute to the goal of understanding natural systems. Simple bottom-up models that describe individuals and their interactions directly have demonstrated that local interactions far from equilibrium can generate collective states. However, such simple models are not likely to describe accurately the actual mechanisms and interactions in play in any real biological system. Other classes of top-down models that describe group-level behavior directly have been proposed for groups where the function of the collective behavior is understood. Such models cannot necessarily explain why or how such functions emerge from first principles. Because modeling approaches have different strengths and weaknesses and no single approach will always be best, we argue that models of collective behavior that are aimed at understanding real biological systems should be formulated to address specific questions and to allow for validation. As examples, we discuss four forms of collective behavior that differ both in the interactions that produce the collective behavior and in ecological context, and thus require very different modeling frameworks. 1) Harvester ants use local interactions consisting of brief antennal contact, in which one ant assesses the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of another, to regulate foraging activity, which can be modeled as a closed-loop excitable system. 2) Arboreal turtle ants form trail networks in the canopy of the tropical forest, using trail pheromone; one ant detects the volatile chemical that another has recently deposited. The process that maintains and repairs the trail, which can be modeled as a distributed algorithm, is constrained by the physical configuration of the network of vegetation in which they travel. 3) Swarms of midges interact acoustically and non-locally, and can be well described as agents moving in an emergent potential well that is representative of the swarm as a whole rather than individuals. 4) Flocks of jackdaws change their effective interactions depending on ecological context, using topological distance when traveling but metric distance when mobbing. We discuss how different research questions about these systems have led to different modeling approaches.

Spatial organization and interactions of harvester ants during foraging activity

Collective Foraging and Behavioural Heterogeneity in Ants: First-Passage Statistics with Heterogeneous Walkers in a Honeycomb Lattice

Unraveling the forces shaping foraging dynamics in harvester ant colonies: Recruitment efficiency and environmental variability

Regulation of harvester ant foraging as a closed-loop excitable system

Walk This Way: Modeling Foraging Ant Dynamics in Multiple Food Source Environments

Spatiotemporal organization of ant foraging from a complex systems perspective

A model for collective dynamics in ant raids

Agitated ants: regulation and self-organization of incipient nest excavation via collisional cues

Chaos–order Transition in Foraging Behavior of Ants

Collective foraging in heterogeneous landscapes

Identifying Robustness in the Regulation of Collective Foraging of Ant Colonies Using an Interaction-Based Model with Backward Bifurcation.

A stochastic model of ant trail formation and maintenance in static and dynamic environments

Collective search in ants: Movement determines footprints, and footprints influence movement

Random walks with spatial and temporal resets may underlie searching movements in ants

A Spatially Dependent Probabilistic Model for House Hunting in Ant Colonies

Efficiency and robustness of ant colony transportation networks

Goals and Limitations of Modeling Collective Behavior in Biological Systems

Modeling tropotaxis in ant colonies: recruitment and trail formation

Social interactions among ants are impacted by food availability and group size

A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions