Local anaesthesia under sedation versus general anaesthesia for brachytherapy-treated patients with uveal melanoma: A patient-reported outcome study

Max Davidson,Alastair Glossop,Hibba Quhill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02979-5
IF: 4.4563
2024-02-13
Eye
Abstract:In the United Kingdom, surgical procedures to treat uveal tumours are traditionally performed under general anaesthetic (GA), as there may be significant intraoperative manipulation of the globe and orbital structures [1]. Local anaesthetic (LA) alone is generally not appropriate, particularly with procedures such as insertion and removal of Ruthenium-106 ("plaque") brachytherapy, which remains the most commonly utilised globe-sparing treatment of uveal melanoma in the UK [1]. The advantages of LA over GA have been well documented. Patients undergoing GA typically require longer hospital admissions and may experience more side effects such as nausea, vomiting or drowsiness [2]. Regional anaesthetic (RA) during surgery for urological cancers may improve mortality and recurrence when compared to GA [3], though such potency in ocular oncology surgery remains unknown. The use of LA and RA in vitreoretinal surgery and open globe repairs continues to grow in the UK and worldwide [4, 5].
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?