The impact of gardening on well-being, mental health, and quality of life: an umbrella review and meta-analysis

I. Panțiru,A. Ronaldson,N. Sima,A. Dregan,R. Sima
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02457-9
2024-01-30
Systematic Reviews
Abstract:Gardening and horticultural therapy (HT) has been widely recognised as a multicomponent approach that has affected a broad range of health and well-being outcomes. The aim of this umbrella review and meta-analysis was to compare the findings of previous reviews on the impact of multiple gardening interventions and gardening attributes on different well-being constructs.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the impact of gardening activities and their attributes on different well - being constructs. Specifically, the author compared the results of previous studies on the effects of various gardening interventions on well - being, mental health, and quality of life through umbrella reviews and meta - analyses. The study aims to synthesize the state of knowledge in existing systematic reviews and meta - analyses and evaluate the quality of the evidence reviewed. ### Main research questions: 1. **To what extent can gardening and horticultural therapy reduce the risks of poor well - being, poor mental health, and poor quality of life?** 2. **Do the benefits of gardening and horticultural therapy depend on the time, intensity, or duration of the activity?** ### Research background: - Gardening and horticultural therapy are widely regarded as a multi - component approach, affecting a wide range of health and well - being outcomes. - Previous literature has usually focused on specific gardening activities or a single well - being construct, such as gardening type, mental health status, or quality of life. - This study evaluated the effects of various gardening interventions on different well - being constructs through umbrella reviews and meta - analyses, providing a more comprehensive comparative perspective. ### Methods: - **Data sources**: Relevant literature was retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. - **Inclusion criteria**: Systematic reviews and meta - analyses of interventional and observational studies were included. - **Outcome measures**: Included mental health, health status, and quality of life. - **Exposure variables**: Gardening and horticultural therapy. - **Data analysis**: Meta - analysis was performed using a random - effects model to evaluate the overall impact of gardening activities on well - being. ### Results: - **Included studies**: A total of 40 studies were included, including 10 interventional studies, 2 observational studies, and 28 mixed studies. - **Main findings**: Gardening activities had a significant positive impact on mental health, quality of life, and health status. Meta - analysis results showed that gardening and horticultural therapy had a significant positive effect on well - being (effect size (ES) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23, 0.87, p < 0.001). ### Conclusions: - **Evidence support**: Evidence from observational and interventional studies supports the positive effects of gardening and horticultural therapy on well - being and overall health. - **Heterogeneity**: High heterogeneity among studies suggests that research results need to be interpreted with caution and direct clinical applications should be avoided. - **Future directions**: More methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to test the causal relationships between specific gardening activities and well - being, and how to promote and support the participation of the urban population in community gardening and nature activities. ### Keywords: - Gardening - Horticultural therapy - Mental health - Nature - Well - being This paper provides comprehensive evidence for the impact of gardening activities on well - being and health through systematic reviews and meta - analyses, but also points out the limitations of existing research and the directions for future research.